Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16736103›Full record

ArticleJournal of molecular evolution2006

A gradient in the distribution of introns in eukaryotic genes.

A Ruvinsky, W Ward

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of molecular evolution, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

A RuvinskyThe Institute for Genetics and Bioinformatics, University of New England, Armidale, 2351, NSW, Australia. aruvinsk@une.edu.au
W Ward
University of New England · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The majority of eukaryotic genes consist of exons and introns. Introns can be inserted either between codons (phase 0) or within codons, after the first nucleotide (phase 1) and after the second (phase 2). We report here that the frequency of phase 0 increases and phase 1 declines from the 5' region to the 3' end of genes. This trend is particularly noticeable in genomes of Homo sapiens and Arabidopsis thaliana, in which gains of novel introns in the 3' portion of genes were probably a dominant process. Similar but more moderate gradients exist in Drosophila melanogaster and Caenorhabditis elegans genomes, where the accumulation of novel introns was not a prevailing factor. There are nine types of exons, three symmetric (0,0; 1,1; 2,2) and six asymmetric (0,1; 1,0; 1,2; 2,1; 2,0; 0,2). Assuming random distribution of different types of introns along genes, one can expect the frequencies of asymmetric exons such as 0,1 and 1,0 or 1,2 and 2,1 to be approximately equal, allowing for some variation caused by randomness. The gradient in intron distribution leads to a small but consistent and statistically significant bias: phase 1 introns are more likely at the 5' ends and phase 0 introns are more likely at the 3' ends of asymmetric exons. For the same reason, the frequency of 0,0 exons increases and the frequency of 1,1 exons decreases in the 3' direction, at least in H. sapiens and A. thaliana. The number of introns per gene also affects the distribution and frequency of phase 0 and 1 introns. The gradient provides an insight into the evolution of intron-exon structures of eukaryotic genes.

Indexed as

Chromosome MappingIntronsStatistical DistributionsAnimalsEukaryotic CellsExonsGenesGenetic StructuresHumans

Identifiers

PMID16736103
OpenAlexW1979702321

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.