ArticleThe Journal of general physiology2006
Estimating binding affinities of the nicotinic receptor for low-efficacy ligands using mixtures of agonists and two-dimensional concentration-response relationships.
Article in The Journal of general physiology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Agonist efficiency from concentration-response curves: Structural implications and applications.Biophysical journal · 2021Article
- Orthosteric and Allosteric Activation of Human 5-HTBiophysical journal · 2020Article
- S. Typhimurium challenge in juvenile pigs modulates the expression and localization of enteric cholinergic proteins and correlates with mucosal injury and inflammation.Autonomic neuroscience : basic & clinical · 2018Article
- Molecular recognition at cholinergic synapses: acetylcholine versus choline.The Journal of physiology · 2017Article
- Catch-and-hold activation of muscle acetylcholine receptors having transmitter binding site mutations.Biophysical journal · 2014Article
- A single channel mutation alters agonist efficacy at 5-HT3A and 5-HT3AB receptors.British journal of pharmacology · 2013Article
- Energy for wild-type acetylcholine receptor channel gating from different choline derivatives.Biophysical journal · 2013Article
- An integrated catch-and-hold mechanism activates nicotinic acetylcholine receptors.The Journal of general physiology · 2012Article
- Bridging the gap between structural models of nicotinic receptor superfamily ion channels and their corresponding functional states.Journal of molecular biology · 2010Article
- Acetylcholine receptor channels activated by a single agonist molecule.Biophysical journal · 2010Article
- Decremental response to high-frequency trains of acetylcholine pulses but unaltered fractional Ca2+ currents in a panel of "slow-channel syndrome" nicotinic receptor mutants.The Journal of general physiology · 2009Article
- Unliganded gating of acetylcholine receptor channels.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2009Article
- Site selectivity of competitive antagonists for the mouse adult muscle nicotinic acetylcholine receptor.Molecular pharmacology · 2009Article
- Structural answers and persistent questions about how nicotinic receptors work.Frontiers in bioscience : a journal and virtual library · 2008Review
- Agonist-dependent single channel current and gating in alpha4beta2delta and alpha1beta2gamma2S GABAA receptors.The Journal of general physiology · 2008Article
- Differential effects of serotonin and dopamine on human 5-HT3A receptor kinetics: interpretation within an allosteric kinetic model.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2007Article
- Desensitization contributes to the synaptic response of gain-of-function mutants of the muscle nicotinic receptor.The Journal of general physiology · 2006Article
- Block of muscle nicotinic receptors by choline suggests that the activation and desensitization gates act as distinct molecular entities.The Journal of general physiology · 2006Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The phenomenon of ligand-induced ion channel gating hinges upon the ability of a receptor channel to bind ligand molecules with conformation-specific affinities. However, our understanding of this fundamental phenomenon is notably limited, not only because the changes in binding site structure and ligand conformation that occur upon gating are largely unknown but, also, because the strength of these ligand-receptor interactions are experimentally elusive. Both high- and low-efficacy ligands pose a number of analytical and experimental challenges that can render the estimation of their conformation-specific binding affinities impossible. In this paper, we present a novel assay that overcomes some of the hurdles presented by weak agonists of the muscle nicotinic receptor and allows the estimation of their closed-state affinities. The method, which we have termed the "activation-competition" assay, consists of a single-channel concentration-response assay performed in the presence of a binary mixture of ligands of widely different efficacies. By plotting the channel response (i.e., the open probability) as a function of the concentration of each agonist in the mixture, interpreting the observed response in the framework of a plausible kinetic scheme, and fitting the open probability surface with the corresponding function, the affinities of the closed receptor for the two agonists can be simultaneously extracted as free parameters. Here, we applied this methodology to estimate the closed-state affinity of the muscle nicotinic receptor for choline (a very weak agonist) using acetylcholine (ACh) as the partner in the mixture. We estimated the dissociation equilibrium constant of choline (K(D)) from the wild type's closed state to be 4.1 +/- 0.5 mM (and that of ACh to be 106 +/- 6 microM). We also discuss the use of accurate estimates of affinities for low-efficacy agonists as a tool to discriminate between binding and gating effects of mutations, and in the context of the rational design of therapeutic drugs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.