Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16735756›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of general physiology2006

Estimating binding affinities of the nicotinic receptor for low-efficacy ligands using mixtures of agonists and two-dimensional concentration-response relationships.

Yamini Purohit, Claudio Grosman

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of general physiology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Unliganded gating of acetylcholine receptor channels.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2009
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Structural answers and persistent questions about how nicotinic receptors work.Frontiers in bioscience : a journal and virtual library · 2008
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Differential effects of serotonin and dopamine on human 5-HT3A receptor kinetics: interpretation within an allosteric kinetic model.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2007
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yamini PurohitDepartment of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, Center for Biophysics and Computational Biology, and Neuroscience Program, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, 61801, USA.
Claudio Grosman
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · US

Funding

Mechanisms of Neurotransmitter-Gated Ion ChannelsR01NS042169 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI GROSMAN, CLAUDIO F · 2003 to 2022
$6.6M
Mechanisms of Neurotransmitter-gated Ion ChannelsR56NS042169 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI GROSMAN, CLAUDIO F · 2007 to 2007
$378k
NINDS NIH HHS NS042169NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS042169
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The phenomenon of ligand-induced ion channel gating hinges upon the ability of a receptor channel to bind ligand molecules with conformation-specific affinities. However, our understanding of this fundamental phenomenon is notably limited, not only because the changes in binding site structure and ligand conformation that occur upon gating are largely unknown but, also, because the strength of these ligand-receptor interactions are experimentally elusive. Both high- and low-efficacy ligands pose a number of analytical and experimental challenges that can render the estimation of their conformation-specific binding affinities impossible. In this paper, we present a novel assay that overcomes some of the hurdles presented by weak agonists of the muscle nicotinic receptor and allows the estimation of their closed-state affinities. The method, which we have termed the "activation-competition" assay, consists of a single-channel concentration-response assay performed in the presence of a binary mixture of ligands of widely different efficacies. By plotting the channel response (i.e., the open probability) as a function of the concentration of each agonist in the mixture, interpreting the observed response in the framework of a plausible kinetic scheme, and fitting the open probability surface with the corresponding function, the affinities of the closed receptor for the two agonists can be simultaneously extracted as free parameters. Here, we applied this methodology to estimate the closed-state affinity of the muscle nicotinic receptor for choline (a very weak agonist) using acetylcholine (ACh) as the partner in the mixture. We estimated the dissociation equilibrium constant of choline (K(D)) from the wild type's closed state to be 4.1 +/- 0.5 mM (and that of ACh to be 106 +/- 6 microM). We also discuss the use of accurate estimates of affinities for low-efficacy agonists as a tool to discriminate between binding and gating effects of mutations, and in the context of the rational design of therapeutic drugs.

Indexed as

AnimalsBinding, CompetitiveCell LineDose-Response Relationship, DrugLigandsMiceNicotinic AgonistsProtein BindingReceptors, NicotinicTime FactorsLigandsNicotinic AgonistsReceptors, Nicotinic

Identifiers

PMID16735756
PMCPMC2151536
OpenAlexW2096342715

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.