Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16735521›Full record

ArticleAnnals of family medicine

Patients' perceptions of cholesterol, cardiovascular disease risk, and risk communication strategies.

Roberta E Goldman, Donna R Parker, Charles B Eaton, Jeffrey M Borkan, Robert Gramling, Rebecca T Cover, David K Ahern

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of family medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT01242319 (Translating ATP III Cholesterol Management Guidelines Into Primary Care Practice), which is not on this map. Cited by 49 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01242319 completednot on this map

Translating ATP III Cholesterol Management Guidelines Into Primary Care Practice

TypeobservationalSponsorMemorial Hospital of Rhode IslandRan2002 to 2008Enrolled5,218ConditionsHypercholesterolemia, Coronary Disease, Primary Health Care, Management, RiskArmsHeartAge intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Patient beliefs and attitudes to taking statins: systematic review of qualitative studies.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2018
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Communicating risk using absolute risk reduction or prolongation of life formats: cluster-randomised trial in general practice.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2014
    Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Roberta E GoldmanDepartment of Family Medicine, Brown Medical School, Providence, RI, USA. roberta_goldman@mhri.org
Donna R Parker
Charles B Eaton
Jeffrey M Borkan
Robert Gramling
Rebecca T Cover
David K Ahern

Funding

Translating ATP III Cholesterol Management Guidelines *R01HL070804 · NHLBI · MEMORIAL HOSPITAL OF RHODE ISLAND · PI EATON, CHARLES B · 2002 to 2006
$2.7M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL70804
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDespite some recent improvement in knowledge about cholesterol in the United States, patient adherence to cholesterol treatment recommendations remains suboptimal. We undertook a qualitative study that explored patients' perceptions of cholesterol and cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk and their reactions to 3 strategies for communicating CVD risk.

methodsWe conducted 7 focus groups in New England using open-ended questions and visual risk communication prompts. The multidisciplinary study team performed qualitative content analysis through immersion/crystallization processes and analyzing coded reports using NVivo qualitative coding software.

resultsAll participants were aware that "high cholesterol" levels adversely affect health. Many had, however, inadequate knowledge about hypercholesterolemia and CVD risk, and few knew their cholesterol numbers. Many assumed they had been tested and their cholesterol concentrations were healthy, even if their physicians had not mentioned it. Standard visual representations showing statistical probabilities of risk were assessed as confusing and uninspiring. A strategy that provides a cardiovascular risk-adjusted age was evaluated as clear, memorable, relevant, and potentially capable of motivating people to make healthful changes. A few participants in each focus group were concerned that a cardiovascular risk-adjusted age that was greater than chronological age would frighten patients.

conclusionsComplex explanations about cholesterol and CVD risk appear to be insufficient for motivating behavior change. A cardiovascular risk-adjusted age calculator is one strategy that may engage patients in recognizing their CVD risk and, when accompanied by information about risk reduction, may be helpful in communicating risk to patients.

Indexed as

CommunicationHealth BehaviorAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCardiovascular DiseasesFemaleFocus GroupsHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansHypercholesterolemiaMaleMiddle AgedMotivationPatient Education as TopicRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID16735521
PMCPMC1479442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.