Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16735403›Full record

ArticleAnnals of botany2006

Effects of the fungal endophyte, Neotyphodium lolii, on net photosynthesis and growth rates of perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne) are independent of In Planta endophyte concentration.

Martin J Spiering, Dennis H Greer, Jan Schmid

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of botany, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Vertically TransmittedJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Martin J SpieringInstitute of Molecular BioSciences, College of Sciences, Massey University, Private Bag 11222, Palmerston North, New Zealand. spierinm@tcd.ie
Dennis H Greer
Jan Schmid
Massey University · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsNeotyphodium lolii is a fungal endophyte of perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne), improving grass fitness through production of bioactive alkaloids. Neotyphodium species can also affect growth and physiology of their host grasses (family Poaceae, sub-family Pooideae), but little is known about the mechanisms. This study examined the effect of N. lolii on net photosynthesis (P(n)) and growth rates in ryegrass genotypes differing in endophyte concentration in all leaf tissues.

methodsPlants from two ryegrass genotypes, Nui D and Nui UIV, infected with N. lolii (E+) differing approx. 2-fold in endophyte concentration or uninfected clones thereof (E-) were grown in a controlled environment. For each genotype x endophyte treatment, plant growth rates were assessed as tillering and leaf extension rates, and the light response of P(n), dark respiration and transpiration measured in leaves of young (30-45 d old) and old (>90 d old) plants with a single-chamber open infrared gas-exchange system. KEY

resultsNeotyphodium lolii affected CO(2)-limited rates of P(n), which were approx. 17 % lower in E+ than E- plants (P < 0.05) in the young plants. Apparent photon yield and dark respiration were unaffected by the endophyte (P > 0.05). Neotyphodium lolii also decreased transpiration (P < 0.05), but only in complete darkness. There were no endophyte effects on P(n) in the old plants (P > 0.05). E+ plants grew faster immediately after replanting (P < 0.05), but had approx. 10 % lower growth rates during mid-log growth (P < 0.05) than E- plants, but there was no effect on final plant biomass (P > 0.05). The endophyte effects on P(n) and growth tended to be more pronounced in Nui UIV, despite having a lower endophyte concentration than Nui D.

conclusionsNeotyphodium lolii affects CO(2) fixation, but not light interception and photochemistry of P(n). The impact of N. lolii on plant growth and photosynthesis is independent of endophyte concentration in the plant, suggesting that the endophyte mycelium is not simply an energy drain to the plant. However, the endophyte effects on P(n) and plant growth are strongly dependent on the plant growth phase.

Indexed as

BiomassCarbon DioxideDarknessHypocrealesLightLoliumPhotosynthesisPlant LeavesPlant TranspirationSymbiosisCarbon Dioxide

Identifiers

PMID16735403
PMCPMC2803460
OpenAlexW2099794008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.