ArticleCancer science2006
Existence of a no effect level for MeIQx hepatocarcinogenicity on a background of thioacetamide-induced liver damage in rats.
Article in Cancer science, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Quantitative Approaches to Assess Key Carcinogenic Events of Genotoxic Carcinogens.Toxicological research · 2018Review
- Mitochondrial DNMT3A and DNA methylation in skeletal muscle and CNS of transgenic mouse models of ALS.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2013Article
- Epigenetic regulation of motor neuron cell death through DNA methylation.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As exposure to heterocyclic amines might increase the risk of liver cancer, we investigated the carcinogenic potential of MeIQx under conditions of liver damage caused by TAA. Male, 6-week-old F344 rats (n = 280) were divided into 14 groups; groups 1-7 received TAA (0.03% in drinking water) and groups 8-14 received water for the first 12 weeks. Thereafter, the animals received MeIQx at doses from 0, 0.001, 0.01, 0.1, 1, 10 to 100 p.p.m. (groups 1-7 and 8-14, respectively) in pellet basal diet for 16 weeks. All survivors were killed at week 28 for assessment of numbers and areas of GST-P positive foci, considered to be pre-neoplastic lesions of the liver. Values were increased significantly in all the groups receiving TAA-->MeIQx compared to MeIQx alone (P < 0.01). Numbers of GST-P positive foci were significantly increased in groups 7 and 14 (treated with 100 p.p.m. MeIQx) as compared to 0 p.p.m.-MeIQx (groups 1 and 8) (P < 0.01), along with areas in group 14 compared to group 8 (P < 0.01). However, with the maximum likelihood method, the data for numbers of GST-P positive foci (groups 1-7 and groups 8-14) fitted the hockey stick regression model, representing no differences from groups 1-5 and from groups 8-13, despite a linear dose-dependent increase of MeIQx-DNA adducts from 0.1 to 100 p.p.m. We conclude that there is a no effect level for MeIQx hepatocarcinogenicity, even on a background of TAA-induced liver damage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.