ReviewDer Internist2006
[Clinical pathways in endocrinology and diabetology].
Review in Der Internist, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Endocrinology and diabetology are disciplines with an interdisciplinary approach. Patients with diabetes or endocrine disorders are diagnosed and treated by multiple disciplines both in an outpatient or in-hospital setting. Additional diabetes-specific professions also participate in the care of diabetic patients. The development of clinical pathways and case-management in institutionalized "Diabetes Centers" and "Endocrinology Centers" as platforms of cooperation is one way to improve patient care and to pool resources. In such centers an interdisciplinary decision support within the diagnostic and therapeutic process is important. E. g., interdisciplinary case conferences expediate and intensify the necessary flow of information. This guarantees the implementation of a rational and concerted treatment according to guidelines and finally optimize the clinical pathways in a continuous process improvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
16733715What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.