Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16732621›Full record

ArticleElectrophoresis2006

Using size exclusion chromatography-RPLC and RPLC-CIEF as two-dimensional separation strategies for protein profiling.

David C Simpson, Seonghee Ahn, Ljiljana Pasa-Tolic, Bogdan Bogdanov, Heather M Mottaz, Andrey N Vilkov, Gordon A Anderson, Mary S Lipton, Richard D Smith

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Electrophoresis, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Multidimensional Separations in Top-Down Proteomics.Analytical science advances · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. It is time for top-down venomics.The journal of venomous animals and toxins including tropical diseases · 2017
    Review
  10. Progress in Top-Down Proteomics and the Analysis of Proteoforms.Annual review of analytical chemistry (Palo Alto, Calif.) · 2016
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

David C SimpsonPacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA 99352, USA.
Seonghee Ahn
Ljiljana Pasa-Tolic
Bogdan Bogdanov
Heather M Mottaz
Andrey N Vilkov
Gordon A Anderson
Mary S Lipton
Richard D Smith
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory · USZero to Three · US

Funding

WORKSHOP AND TRAINING ACTIVITIESP41RR018522 · NCRR · BATTELLE PACIFIC NORTHWEST LABORATORIES · PI SMITH, RICHARD D · 2003 to 2011
$25.1M
NCRR NIH HHS P41 RR018522NCRR NIH HHS RR018522
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bottom-up proteomics (analyzing peptides that result from protein digestion) has demonstrated capability for broad proteome coverage and good throughput. However, due to incomplete sequence coverage, this approach is not ideally suited to the study of modified proteins. The modification complement of a protein can best be elucidated by analyzing the intact protein. 2-DE, typically coupled with the analysis of peptides that result from in-gel digestion, is the most frequently applied protein separation technique in MS-based proteomics. As an alternative, numerous column-based liquid phase techniques, which are generally more amenable to automation, are being investigated. In this work, the combination of size-exclusion chromatography (SEC) fractionation with RPLC-Fourier-transform ion cyclotron resonance (FTICR)-MS is compared with the combination of RPLC fractionation with CIEF-FTICR-MS for the analysis of the Shewanella oneidensis proteome. SEC-RPLC-FTICR-MS allowed the detection of 297 proteins, as opposed to 166 using RPLC-CIEF-FTICR-MS, indicating that approaches based on LC-MS provide better coverage. However, there were significant differences in the sets of proteins detected and both approaches provide a basis for accurately quantifying changes in protein and modified protein abundances.

Indexed as

Bacterial ProteinsChromatography, LiquidElectrophoresis, CapillaryIsoelectric FocusingPeptide FragmentsProteomicsShewanellaSpectroscopy, Fourier Transform InfraredBacterial ProteinsPeptide Fragments

Identifiers

PMID16732621
PMCPMC1769308
OpenAlexW2072458917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.