Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16731735›Full record

ReviewJournal of medical ethics2006

Feminism and public health ethics.

W A Rogers

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of medical ethics, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Functional neurological disorder is a feminist issue.Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry · 2023
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. A Feminist Approach to Analyzing Sex Disparities in COVID-19 Outcomes.International journal of feminist approaches to bioethics · 2022
    Article
  12. [Feminist perspectives in German-language medical ethics: a review and three hypotheses].Ethik in der Medizin : Organ der Akademie fur Ethik in der Medizin · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Obesity, political responsibility, and the politics of needs.Medicine, health care, and philosophy · 2019
    Article
  20. From 'implications' to 'dimensions': science, medicine and ethics in society.Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy · 2013
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

W A RogersDepartment of Medical Education, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia. wendy.rogers@flinders.edu.au

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper sketches an account of public health ethics drawing upon established scholarship in feminist ethics. Health inequities are one of the central problems in public health ethics; a feminist approach leads us to examine not only the connections between gender, disadvantage, and health, but also the distribution of power in the processes of public health, from policy making through to programme delivery. The complexity of public health demands investigation using multiple perspectives and an attention to detail that is capable of identifying the health issues that are important to women, and investigating ways to address these issues. Finally, a feminist account of public health ethics embraces rather than avoids the inescapable political dimensions of public health.

Indexed as

FeminismFemaleFinancing, OrganizedGender IdentityHealth Services AccessibilityHumansPoliticsPovertyPublic HealthResearch DesignSocial Justice

Identifiers

PMID16731735
PMCPMC2563367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.