ArticleActa histochemica2006
Microbead analysis of cell binding to immobilized lectin: an alternative to microarrays in the development of carbohydrate drugs and diagnostic tests.
Article in Acta histochemica, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- A glycobiology review: carbohydrates, lectins and implications in cancer therapeutics.Acta histochemica · 2011Review
- Carbohydrate-based experimental therapeutics for cancer, HIV/AIDS and other diseases.Acta histochemica · 2008Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Microarray technology is currently used in the development of carbohydrate drugs and diagnostic tests. Here we model an inexpensive alternative to microarrays using derivatized microbeads. In this model we examine the binding of mannose-rich yeast to microbeads derivatized with concanavalin A (Con A), a mannose-binding lectin, in the presence of 30 different sugars and 9 different pH conditions. We developed a listing of effective saccharide inhibitors of immobilized Con A based on 3901 replicates. We suggest that this is the most extensive saccharide inhibitor list ever developed for this lectin and it may be useful to use this listing to replace the less extensive lists that have been in the literature for decades. Information is also provided on pH effects on immobilized Con A binding based on 918 trials. Two assays to study binding, one which qualitatively scores more or less binding than control in thousands of replicate samples, and another that quantitatively evaluates binding by counting the number of cells bound to each bead, are also modeled here. We know of no previous studies that provide such extensive information on saccharide inhibition and pH effects on the binding of immobilized Con A. We suggest that this microbead approach, using beads derivatized with lectins or sugars, and the two simple assays presented here, can in some cases substitute for more expensive microarray technology in the development of carbohydrate drugs and diagnostic tests. If, for example, our model Saccharomyces cerevisiae was a pathogen, these studies show that it binds via cell surface mannose residues and drugs to prevent binding could be developed using the inhibitors of binding identified here. The beads could be also used in the development of diagnostic tests that identify the presence of the organism in blood samples, etc. in much the same way as microarray technology is being used today.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.