Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16729037›Full record

ArticleMolecular systems biology2005

Integrative analysis of genome-wide experiments in the context of a large high-throughput data compendium.

Amos Tanay, Israel Steinfeld, Martin Kupiec, Ron Shamir

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular systems biology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Network-based prediction of protein function.Molecular systems biology · 2007
    Review
  17. Quantification of protein half-lives in the budding yeast proteome.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2006
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Amos TanaySchool of Computer Science, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel. amos@post.tau.ac.il
Israel Steinfeld
Martin Kupiec
Ron Shamir

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biological systems are orchestrated by heterogeneous regulatory programs that control complex processes and adapt to a dynamic environment. Recent advances in high-throughput experimental methods provide genome-wide perspectives on such regulatory programs. A considerable amount of data on the behavior of model systems in a variety of conditions is rapidly accumulating. Still, the dominant paradigm is to analyze new genome-wide experiments separately from any other extant data, for example, by clustering the new data alone. Here we introduce a new methodology for analyzing the results of a new functional genomic study vis-à-vis a large compendium of previously published results from heterogeneous experimental techniques. We demonstrate our methodology on Saccharomyces cerevisiae, using a compendium of some 2000 experiments from 60 different publications. Most importantly, we show how the integrated analysis reveals unexpected connections among biological processes, and differentiates between novel and known effects in the analyzed experiments. Such characterization is impossible when new data sets are studied in isolation. Our results exemplify the power of the integrative approach in the analysis of genomic scale data sets and call for a paradigm shift in their study.

Indexed as

Genetic TechniquesGenomicsAlgorithmsComputational BiologyCytokinesisGalactoseGene Expression Regulation, FungalGenes, FungalHypertonic SolutionsInternetOsmotic PressureResearch DesignSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsTranscription, GeneticGalactoseHypertonic SolutionsSaccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins

Identifiers

PMID16729037
PMCPMC1681453

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.