Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16724253›Full record

ReviewPlant molecular biology2006

Stem cell signalling networks in plants.

Bruce Veit

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Plant molecular biology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
10.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bruce VeitPlant Breeding and Genomics, AgResearch Ltd, Tennent Drive, Private Bag 11008, Palmerston North, New Zealand. bruce.veit@agresearch.co.nz
AgResearch · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The essential nature of meristematic tissues is addressed with reference to conceptual frameworks that have been developed to explain the behaviour of animal stem cells. Comparisons are made between different types of plant meristems with the objective of highlighting common themes that might illuminate underlying mechanisms. A more in depth comparison of the root and shoot apical meristems is made which suggests a common mechanism for maintaining stem cells. The relevance of organogenesis to stem cell maintenance is discussed, along with the nature of underlying mechanisms which help ensure that stem cell production is balanced with the depletion of cells through differentiation. Mechanisms that integrate stem cell behaviour in the whole plant are considered, with a focus on the roles of auxin and cytokinin. The review concludes with a brief discussion of epigenetic mechanisms that act to stabilise and maintain stem cell populations.

Indexed as

Cell DifferentiationEpigenesis, GeneticGene Expression Regulation, PlantHomeodomain ProteinsMeristemModels, BiologicalPlant Growth RegulatorsPlant ProteinsSignal TransductionStem CellsTranscription FactorsHomeodomain ProteinsPlant Growth RegulatorsPlant ProteinsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID16724253
OpenAlexW2142305326

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.