Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16724165›Full record

ReviewJournal of plant research2006

Patterned cell development in the secondary phloem of dicotyledonous trees: a review and a hypothesis.

Peter W Barlow, Jacqueline Lück

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of plant research, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The botanical multiverse of Peter Barlow.Communicative & integrative biology · 2019
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Peter W BarlowSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Woodland Road, Bristol, BS8 1UG, UK. P.W.Barlow@bristol.ac.uk
Jacqueline Lück

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The secondary phloem of dicotyledonous trees and shrubs is constructed of sieve tube cells (S) and their companion cells, as well as parenchyma (P) and fibre (F) cells. Different species have characteristic sequences of these S, P and F cells within the radial files of their phloem. The sequences are recurrent, and are evidence of rhythmic cell determination and differentiation. A model was devised to account for the sequences found in various dicot tree species. It is based on the pattern of radial displacement of cells through a gradient of morphogen which supports secondary phloem development. According to this model, each tree species shows a particular pattern of post-mitotic cellular displacement along each radial file as a result of a corresponding sequence of periclinal division in the cambial initial and its descendents. The divisions and displacements ensure that at each timestep (equivalent to an interdivisional interval) each cell resides in a specific location within the morphogenic gradient. Cells then emerge from the post-mitotic zone of cell determination, having acquired different final positional values. These values lie above a series of thresholds that permit the respective determination and subsequent differentiation of one or other of the three cell types S, P and F. The recurrent nature of the sequences of the three cell types within each radial cell file, as well as their tangential banding, are a consequence of a shared rhythmic spatio-temporal pattern of periclinal cambial divisions. With a single set of morphogen parameters required for cell determination, and using three positions for cambial cell divisions, all the cellular sequences of secondary phloem illustrated in the literature can be accounted for.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalPlant StemsTrees

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.