Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16724158›Full record

ArticleClinical psychology : a publication of the Division of Clinical Psychology of the American Psychological Association2006

Integrating Decision Making and Mental Health Interventions Research: Research Directions.

Celia E Wills, Margaret Holmes-Rovner

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical psychology : a publication of the Division of Clinical Psychology of the American Psychological Association, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03609515 (Patient-controlled Admissions in Inpatient Mental Health Services), which is not on this map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03609515 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2011, after this paper: background citation

Patient-controlled Admissions in Inpatient Mental Health Services

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital, AkershusRan2011 to 2012Enrolled58ConditionsPsychoses, Affective DisorderArmsPatient-controlled admission
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Clinical decision-making style preferences of European psychiatrists: Results from the Ambassadors survey in 38 countries.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Moving Toward a Precision-Based, Personalized Framework for Prevention Science: Introduction to the Special Issue.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Desire for information of people with severe mental illness.Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology · 2014
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Celia E WillsMichigan State University.
Margaret Holmes-Rovner

Funding

PATIENT DECISION MAKING ABOUT ANTIDEPRESSANT MEDICATIONK08MH001721 · NIMH · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI WILLS, CELIA E. · 2000 to 2004
$586k
NIMH NIH HHS K08 MH001721
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The importance of incorporating patient and provider decision-making processes is in the forefront of the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) agenda for improving mental health interventions and services. Key concepts in patient decision making are highlighted within a simplified model of patient decision making that links patient-level/"micro" variables to services-level/"macro" variables via the decision-making process that is a target for interventions. The prospective agenda for incorporating decision-making concepts in mental health research includes (a) improved measures for characterizing decision-making processes that are matched to study populations, complexity, and types of decision making; (b) testing decision aids in effectiveness research for diverse populations and clinical settings; and (c) improving the understanding and incorporation of preference concepts in enhanced intervention designs.

Identifiers

PMID16724158
PMCPMC1466549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.