Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16724119›Full record

Trial reportJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2006

Comparing two methods of delivering high-flow gas therapy by nasal cannula following endotracheal extubation: a prospective, randomized, masked, crossover trial.

D D Woodhead, D K Lambert, J M Clark, R D Christensen

3 registry-linked trialsAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 34 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00609882 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2007, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of Humidified High Flow Nasal Cannula to Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure for Non-Invasive Respiratory Support in Neonates

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of UtahRan2007 to 2012Enrolled420ConditionsRespiratory InsufficiencyArmsNasal CPAP, Humidified High Flow Nasal Cannula (HHFNC)
NCT02499744 phase1unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

Humidified High Flow Nasal Cannula Versus Nasal Intermittent Positive Ventilation in Neonates as Primary Respiratory Support:a Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorGao WeiWeiRan2016 to 2017Enrolled200ConditionsRespiratory InsufficiencyArmsNIPPV, HHFNC
NCT03171129 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Adaptive Dynamic Inspiratory Nasal Apparatus (ADINA): Comparison to High Flow Nasal Cannula (HFNC)

TypeinterventionalSponsorLoma Linda UniversityRan2026 to 2027Enrolled40ConditionsRespiratory Distress NeonatalArmsAdaptive Dynamic Inspiratory Nasal Apparatus, High flow Nasal Canula
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 131 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. High flow nasal cannula for respiratory support in term infants.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. High flow nasal cannula for respiratory support in preterm infants.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Mechanisms of nasal high flow on ventilation during wakefulness and sleep.Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) · 2013
    Trial
  6. High-flow nasal cannula and extubation success in the premature infant: a comparison of two modalities.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2010
    Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Reporting nasal pressure injuries in neonates receiving non-invasive ventilation: a scoping review.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2024
    Article
  10. Nasal high flow therapy for primary respiratory support in preterm infants.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Consensus approach to nasal high-flow therapy in neonates.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2017
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Nasal high flow treatment in preterm infants.Maternal health, neonatology and perinatology · 2017
    Review
  20. High-flow nasal cannula therapy for adult patients.The Journal of international medical research · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

D D WoodheadIntermountain Healthcare, McKay-Dee Hospital, Ogden, UT 84403, USA. rdchris4@ihc.com
D K Lambert
J M Clark
R D Christensen
Intermountain Healthcare · USMcKay Dee Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWe compared two methods of delivering high-flow gas therapy by nasal cannula, applied immediately after planned endotracheal extubations of NICU patients. STUDY DESIGN AND

methodsThirty NICU patients who were about to be extubated from mechanical ventilation were randomized into two groups; Group 1 received Vapotherm for the first 24 h after extubation, then standard high-flow nasal cannula for the next 24 h, and Group 2 received standard high-flow therapy for the first 24 h, then Vapotherm for the next 24 h. At 24 h after extubation and again 48 h after extubation, a neonatologist who was not aware which modality the patient had been receiving examined the nasal mucosa and applied a scoring system. A research nurse who was unaware of the modality abstracted respiratory rates and respiratory effort scores from a specific study-bedside record. The experimental design was such that a patient could 'fail' extubation either by reintubation for mechanical ventilation, or by rescue to the opposite modality before completing the 24-h test period.

resultsFifteen patients were randomized to Group 1 and 15 to Group 2. No differences were apparent between the groups in birth weight, gestational age, age at study entry, gender or underlying pulmonary disorder. Respiratory rates were similar while on Vapotherm (52+/-13 breaths/min, mean+/-s.d.) and high-flow (54+/-14/min). At 24 h after starting the modality, those on Vapotherm had more normal examinations of the nasal mucosa (2.7+/-1.2 vs 7.8+/-1.7, P < 0.0005) and lower respiratory effort scores (1.2+/-0.6 vs 2.0+/-0.9, P < 0.05) than did those on high-flow. No patients failed while on Vapotherm, but seven failed while on high-flow (two reintubations and five rescue switches to Vapotherm, P < 0.005).

conclusionsAmong NICU patients immediately following extubation, Vapotherm performed better than a standard high-flow nasal cannula in maintaining a normal appearing nasal mucosa, a lower respiratory effort score, and averting reintubation.

Indexed as

Continuous Positive Airway PressureDevice RemovalIntubation, IntratrachealOxygen Inhalation TherapyBirth WeightCross-Over StudiesDouble-Blind MethodFemaleGestational AgeHumansInfant, NewbornMaleNasal MucosaRespiratory MechanicsRespiratory Tract DiseasesVentilator Weaning

Identifiers

PMID16724119
OpenAlexW2037450751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.