Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16723574›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2006

Comparative efficacies, toxicities, and tissue concentrations of amphotericin B lipid formulations in a murine pulmonary aspergillosis model.

Jon A Olson, Jill P Adler-Moore, Julie Schwartz, Gerard M Jensen, Richard T Proffitt

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Preclinical Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Antifungal Activity of Liposomal Amphotericin B.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2019
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Tissue penetration of antifungal agents.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2014
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Section 4: Contrast-induced AKI.Kidney international supplements · 2012
    Article
  15. Section 3: Prevention and Treatment of AKI.Kidney international supplements · 2012
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Aerosolized Delivery of Antifungal Agents.Current fungal infection reports · 2010
    Article
  19. Mucormycosis, pseudallescheriasis, and other uncommon mold infections.Proceedings of the American Thoracic Society · 2010
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jon A OlsonDepartment of Biological Sciences, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, 91768, USA.
Jill P Adler-Moore
Julie Schwartz
Gerard M Jensen
Richard T Proffitt
California State Polytechnic University · USCharles River Associates · USGilead Sciences (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Invasive aspergillosis, an important cause of morbidity and mortality in immunosuppressed (IS) patients, is often treated with amphotericin B lipid formulations. In the present study, liposomal amphotericin B (L-AMB) and amphotericin B lipid complex (ABLC) were compared in treatment of murine pulmonary aspergillosis. Uninfected, IS mice were treated for 4 days with 1, 4, 8, or 12 mg L-AMB or ABLC/kg of body weight, and their lungs were analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography for drug concentrations. IS mice intranasally challenged with Aspergillus fumigatus were treated with 12, 15, or 20 mg/kg L-AMB or ABLC and monitored for survival, fungal burden (CFU), and tissue drug concentration. Blood urea nitrogen (BUN) levels and kidney histopathology were determined for uninfected and infected mice given 15 or 20 mg/kg L-AMB or ABLC. The results showed that both drugs had therapeutic levels of drug (>3.0 microg/g) in the lungs of uninfected or infected mice, and 24 h after the last dose, ABLC levels were significantly higher than L-AMB levels (P < 0.02). L-AMB and ABLC at 12 mg/kg both produced 57% survival, but only L-AMB at 15 or 20 mg/kg further increased survival to 80 to 90%, with BUN levels and kidney morphology similar to those of controls. Survival at 15 or 20 mg/kg ABLC was not significantly different than that of controls, and BUN levels were significantly elevated, with tubular alterations in uninfected animals and acute necrosis in kidney tubules of infected animals. In conclusion, although both drugs were effective in prolonging survival at 12 mg/kg, the reduced nephrotoxicity of L-AMB increased its therapeutic index, allowing for its safe and effective use at 15 or 20 mg/kg.

Indexed as

Administration, InhalationAerosolsAmphotericin BAnimalsAntifungal AgentsAspergillosisAspergillus fumigatusBlood Urea NitrogenColony Count, MicrobialDisease Models, AnimalDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug CombinationsDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsFemaleKidney TubulesLiposomesAerosolsAmphotericin BAntifungal AgentsDrug Combinationsliposomal amphotericin BLiposomesPhosphatidylcholinesPhosphatidylglycerols

Identifiers

PMID16723574
PMCPMC1479157
OpenAlexW1972697824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.