ArticleBMC molecular biology2006
No direct effect of the -521 C/T polymorphism in the human dopamine D4 receptor gene promoter on transcriptional activity.
Article in BMC molecular biology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genetic Variants Associated With Resilience in Human and Animal Studies.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2022Pooled it
- Variation in the Dopamine-4-Receptor Gene in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes.Neuroendocrinology · 2023Article
- FOXN3 and GDNF Polymorphisms as Common Genetic Factors of Substance Use and Addictive Behaviors.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Article
- Unravelling the interaction between theBMJ open sport & exercise medicine · 2019Article
- Article
- Data describing the effect of DRD4 promoter polymorphisms on promoter activity.Data in brief · 2016Article
- Developmental imaging genetics: linking dopamine function to adolescent behavior.Brain and cognition · 2014Review
- Dissociable genetic contributions to error processing: a multimodal neuroimaging study.PloS one · 2014Article
- Effects of the DRD4 genotype on neural networks associated with executive functions in children and adolescents.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2012Article
- Psychopathological aspects of dopaminergic gene polymorphisms in adolescence and young adulthood.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2011Review
- Article
- Hypoxia-induced transcription of dopamine D3 and D4 receptors in human neuroblastoma and astrocytoma cells.BMC neuroscience · 2009Article
- The impact of catechol-O-methyltransferase and dopamine D4 receptor genotypes on neurophysiological markers of performance monitoring.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2007Article
- Novel repeat polymorphisms of the dopaminergic neurotransmitter genes among dogs and wolves.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2007Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe human dopamine D4 receptor (DRD4) gene has been studied extensively as a candidate gene for certain psychological traits and several behavioural and psychiatric disorders. Both the 5' regulatory region and the coding sequence contain a number of polymorphisms. The promoter variants have received particular attention in the past few years due to their possible role in the regulation of gene transcription. Previously, the -521C/T SNP was shown to influence promoter activity. The aim of this study is to perform an in-depth analysis of this effect in the context of various neural cell lines.
resultsEndogenous mRNA expression of the DRD4 gene was demonstrated in two neuroblastoma (SK-N-F1, IMR32) and one retinoblastoma cell line (Y79) by RT-PCR. In addition, very low DRD4 mRNA levels were also detected in HeLa cells. The transcriptional activity of a series of 5' promoter deletion mutants was determined by transient transfection of luciferase reporter constructs. The activity profile of these promoter fragments was similar in each of the cell lines tested. The highest luciferase reporter activity was obtained with a construct containing promoter sequences between nucleotides -668 to -389, while a putative silencer region was localised spanning from nucleotide -1571 to -800. Surprisingly, the -521 C/T polymorphism had no significant effect on transcriptional activity of the reporter construct with the highest activity (-668 to -389) in any of the three cell lines tested.
conclusionOur results do not confirm previous data assigning different transcriptional activities to the -521 C/T alleles of the human DRD4 promoter. Furthermore, these findings highlight the need for further characterization of the 5' regulatory region of the DRD4 gene and identification of additional functional promoter polymorphic sites, especially in the context of haplotype.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.