Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16722874›Full record

ArticleInternational wound journal2004

Surgical site infection - a European perspective of incidence and economic burden.

David J Leaper, Harry van Goor, Jacqueline Reilly, Nicola Petrosillo, Heinrich K Geiss, Antonio J Torres, Anne Berger

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in International wound journal, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03527433 (A Randomized, Controlled Trial Comparing Wound COmplications in Elective Midline Laparotomies After FAscia Closure Using Two Different Techniques of Running Sutures), which is not on this map. Cited by 114 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
114citing papers in PubMed, 10 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03527433 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

A Randomized, Controlled Trial Comparing Wound COmplications in Elective Midline Laparotomies After FAscia Closure Using Two Different Techniques of Running Sutures: COFACTOR-trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorAmerican University of Beirut Medical CenterRan2019 to 2025Enrolled274ConditionsWound ComplicationArmsNew closure technique
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

114 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. What are the risk factors for surgical site infection after spinal fusion? A meta-analysis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2018
    Pooled it
  6. The Effect of Antibiotic-Coated Sutures on the Incidence of Surgical Site Infections in Abdominal Closures: a Meta-Analysis.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2017
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Alcohol drinking does not affect postoperative surgical site infection or anastomotic leakage: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2014
    Pooled it
  10. Antimicrobial agents for complicated skin and skin-structure infections: justification of noninferiority margins in the absence of placebo-controlled trials.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2009
    Pooled it
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Article
  20. Article

54 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

David J LeaperUniversity Hospital of North Tees, Stockton on Tees, UK. profdavidleaper@doctors.org.uk
Harry van Goor
Jacqueline Reilly
Nicola Petrosillo
Heinrich K Geiss
Antonio J Torres
Anne Berger

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This retrospective review of reported surgical site infection (SSI) rates in Europe was undertaken to obtain an estimated scale of the problem and the associated economic burden. Preliminary literature searches revealed incomplete datasets when applying the National Nosocomial Infection Surveillance System criteria. Following an expanded literature search, studies were selected according to the number of parameters reported, from those identified as critical for accurate determination of SSI rates. Forty-eight studies were analysed. None of the reviewed studies recorded all the data necessary to enable a comparative assessment of the SSI rate to be undertaken. The estimated range from selected studies analysed varied widely from 1.5-20% - a consequence of inconsistencies in data collection methods, surveillance criteria and wide variations in the surgical procedures investigated - often unspecified. SSIs contribute greatly to the economic costs of surgical procedures - estimated range: 1.47-19.1 billion Euro dollars. The analysis suggests that the true rate of SSIs, currently unknown, is likely to have been previously under-reported. Consequently, the associated economic burden is also likely to be underestimated. A significant improvement in study design, data collection, analysis and reporting will be necessary to ensure that SSI baseline rates are more accurately assessed to enable the evaluation of future cost-effective measures.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsCohort StudiesCombined Modality TherapyCross InfectionDebridementEuropeFemaleHealth Care CostsHumansIncidenceMalePrognosisReoperationRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentSeverity of Illness IndexAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID16722874
PMCPMC7951634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.