ArticleJournal of biomedical discovery and collaboration2006
Enhancing access to the Bibliome: the TREC 2004 Genomics Track.
Article in Journal of biomedical discovery and collaboration, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Semantic annotation of biological concepts interplaying microbial cellular responses.BMC bioinformatics · 2011Article
- Concept-based query expansion for retrieving gene related publications from MEDLINE.BMC bioinformatics · 2010Article
- The ImageCLEFmed medical image retrieval task test collection.Journal of digital imaging · 2009Review
- Finding query suggestions for PubMed.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2009Article
- Concept recognition for extracting protein interaction relations from biomedical text.Genome biology · 2008Article
- Text mining for biology--the way forward: opinions from leading scientists.Genome biology · 2008Article
- Collaborative development of the Arrowsmith two node search interface designed for laboratory investigators.Journal of biomedical discovery and collaboration · 2006Article
- A tutorial on information retrieval: basic terms and concepts.Journal of biomedical discovery and collaboration · 2006Article
- Cross-topic learning for work prioritization in systematic review creation and update.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIAArticle
- Advancing biomedical image retrieval: development and analysis of a test collection.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIAArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe goal of the TREC Genomics Track is to improve information retrieval in the area of genomics by creating test collections that will allow researchers to improve and better understand failures of their systems. The 2004 track included an ad hoc retrieval task, simulating use of a search engine to obtain documents about biomedical topics. This paper describes the Genomics Track of the Text Retrieval Conference (TREC) 2004, a forum for evaluation of IR research systems, where retrieval in the genomics domain has recently begun to be assessed.
resultsA total of 27 research groups submitted 47 different runs. The most effective runs, as measured by the primary evaluation measure of mean average precision (MAP), used a combination of domain-specific and general techniques. The best MAP obtained by any run was 0.4075. Techniques that expanded queries with gene name lists as well as words from related articles had the best efficacy. However, many runs performed more poorly than a simple baseline run, indicating that careful selection of system features is essential.
conclusionVarious approaches to ad hoc retrieval provide a diversity of efficacy. The TREC Genomics Track and its test collection resources provide tools that allow improvement in information retrieval systems.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.