ArticleMedical oncology (Northwood, London, England)2006
Primary extranodal lymphomas of gastrointestinal localizations: a single institution 5-yr experience.
Article in Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England), 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Surgery shows survival benefit in patients with primary intestinal diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: A population-based study.Cancer medicine · 2021Article
- Article
- Gastrointestinal lymphomas in a North American population: clinicopathologic features from one major Central-Midwestern United States tertiary care medical center.Diagnostic pathology · 2012Article
- Primary intestinal non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a clinicopathologic analysis of 81 patients.World journal of gastroenterology · 2011Article
- Primary non-Hodgkin lymphomas in the small and large intestine: clinicopathological characteristics and management of 40 patients.International journal of hematology · 2008Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study is aimed at comparison of patients with extranodal lymphomas based on pathohistological findings differences (MALT vs non-MALT) as well as regarding gastric and non-gastric localization, and determining the significance of clinical-laboratory parameters with respect to therapeutic response and length of survival. A total of 56 patients with extranodal non-Hodgkin's lymphomas of the gastrointestinal tract were evaluated over a 5-yr period. Regarding the localization of the disease, the stomach was most frequently affected, 39 patients (70%); followed by small and large intestines, 17 patients. As for the pathohistological findings, MALT lymphoma accounted for 70%, DLBCL 25%, while other subtypes accounted for 5%. Patients' distribution was analyzed according to CS based on both Ann Arbor and Lugano systems; however, the difference obtained between the groups was not statistically significant in both staging types of patients. Statistically significant difference in patients' distribution was not found with respect to IPI index, bone marrow infiltration, anemia, hypoalbuminemia, or histological subtype and localization. Difference in survival between patients according to the pathohistological type was not statistically significant also according to the type of the affected gastrointestinal tract organ. Statistical significance of difference according to survival probability was obtained based on age (survival is longer in patients over 55 yr of age); according to CS and according to Ann Arbor and Lugano classifications (the patients with lower CS live significantly longer); according to IPI index (the survival is significantly longer in patients with lower probability: IPI-0,1, and 2), as well as patients free of bone marrow infiltration whose survival is also significantly longer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
16720923What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.