ReviewWorld journal of gastroenterology2006
Functional oesophago-gastric junction imaging.
Review in World journal of gastroenterology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Use of Endoflip - Impedance Planimetry System: For Which Indications?Visceral medicine · 2025Review
- What Is the Future of Impedance Planimetry in Gastroenterology?Journal of neurogastroenterology and motility · 2018Review
- Emerging Roles of the Endolumenal Functional Lumen Imaging Probe in Gastrointestinal Motility Disorders.Journal of neurogastroenterology and motility · 2017Review
- Functional lumen imaging of the gastrointestinal tract.Journal of gastroenterology · 2015Review
- Microdissection of Human Esophagogastric Junction Wall with Phase-contrast X-ray CT Imaging.Scientific reports · 2015Article
- Clinical potential of naloxegol in the management of opioid-induced bowel dysfunction.Clinical and experimental gastroenterology · 2014Review
- In vitro effect of pantoprazole on lower esophageal sphincter tone in rats.World journal of gastroenterology · 2011Article
- Twenty years of laparoscopic fundoplication for GERD.World journal of surgery · 2011Review
- Esophagogastric junction distensibility assessed with an endoscopic functional luminal imaging probe (EndoFLIP).Gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2010Article
- Esophagogastric junction distensibility after fundoplication assessed with a novel functional luminal imaging probe.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2010Article
- Functional luminal imaging probe geometric and histomorphologic analysis of abdominal wall wound induced by different trocars in pigs.Surgical endoscopy · 2009Article
- Computation of flow through the oesophagogastric junction.World journal of gastroenterology · 2007Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite its role in disease there is still no definitive method to assess oesophago-gastric junction competence (OGJ). Traditionally the OGJ has been assessed using manometry with lower oesophageal sphincter pressure as the indicator. More recently this has been shown not to be a very reliable marker of sphincter function and competence against reflux. Disorders such as gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and to a lesser extend achalasia still effects a significant number of patients. This review looks at using a new technique known as impedance planimetry to profile the geometry and pressure in the OGJ during distension of a bag. The data gathered can be reconstructed into a dynamic representation of OGJ action. This has been shown to provide a useful representation of the OGJ and to show changes to the competence of the OGJ in terms of compliance and distensibility as a result of endoluminal therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.