ReviewDer Anaesthesist2006
[Coma. The prognostic value of evoked potentials in patients after traumatic brain injury].
Review in Der Anaesthesist, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe prognosis after traumatic coma is often unclear. We investigated the prognostic value of somatosensory (SSEP) and early acoustic (EAEP) evoked potentials on comatose patients in the intensive care unit regarding long-term outcome. Different evaluation systems were investigated.
methodsThis was a retrospective analysis of 100 patients. SSEP and EAEP were examined at different times and analysed according to the Riffel score. Combinations of the different types of potentials were evaluated regarding possible improvement of outcome prediction.
resultsThe positive predictive value of at least one missing peak V of the EAEP regarding a fatal prognosis was 83%. The negative predictive value of the EAEP was 96%. A good outcome (GOS 4+5) could be predicted by bilateral normal SSEP and EAEP with a positive predictive value of 98%.
conclusionsEarly evaluation of SSEP and EAEP allows reliable prognostic predictions regarding a later outcome in patients with severe traumatic brain injury and should therefore be used more often for intensive care patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
16718461What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.