SynthesisSurgical endoscopy2006
Comparison of laparoscopic and open ileocecal resection for Crohn's disease: a metaanalysis.
Synthesis in Surgical endoscopy, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
61 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 190 citations in OpenAlex.
- WSES-AAST guidelines: management of inflammatory bowel disease in the emergency setting.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2021Guideline
- A review of reports on single-incision laparoscopic surgery for Crohn's disease.Surgery today · 2019Pooled it
- A meta-analysis of short-term outcome of laparoscopic surgery versus conventional open surgery on colorectal carcinoma.Medicine · 2017Pooled it
- Meta-analysis of laparoscopic surgery for recurrent Crohn's disease.Surgery today · 2016Pooled it
- Laparoscopic surgery for Crohn's disease: a meta-analysis of perioperative complications and long term outcomes compared with open surgery.BMC surgery · 2013Pooled it
- Crohn's disease.BMJ clinical evidence · 2011Pooled it
- Crohn's disease.BMJ clinical evidence · 2007Pooled it
- Short-term outcomes of laparoscopy combined with enhanced recovery pathway after ileocecal resection for Crohn's disease: a case-matched analysis.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2013Trial
- Laparoscopic versus open ileo-colonic resection in Crohn's disease: short- and long-term results from a prospective longitudinal study.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2008Trial
- Ileocecal resection for primary Crohn's disease: a 17-year experience from a tertiary care hospital in North Africa.Crohn's & colitis 360 · 2026Article
- Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for IBD: a case-matched comparison during the learning curve.Updates in surgery · 2026Article
- Substantial Reduction of Systemic Corticosteroid Use After Primary Ileocaecal Resection in Swedish Patients With Crohn's Disease: A Population-Based Cohort Study.Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics · 2025Article
- Revisiting fibrosis in inflammatory bowel disease: the gut thickens.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2022Review
- Robotic Surgery in Crohn's Disease.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2021Review
- Crohn's Disease Obstructions.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2021Review
- Inflammatory bowel disease position statement of the Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery (SICCR): Crohn's disease.Techniques in coloproctology · 2020Review
- Robotic-assisted ileocolic resection for Crohn's disease: outcomes from an early national experience.Journal of robotic surgery · 2019Article
- SICE national survey: current state on the adoption of laparoscopic approach to the treatment of colorectal disease in Italy.Updates in surgery · 2019Article
- Factors Associated with Short-Term Morbidity in Patients Undergoing Colon Resection for Crohn's Disease.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2018Article
- Pediatric Crohn's Disease.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2018Review
1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe role of laparoscopic surgery for patients with ileocecal Crohn's disease is a contentious issue. This metaanalysis aimed to compare open resection with laparoscopically assisted resection for ileocecal Crohn's disease.
methodsA literature search of the Medline, Ovid, Embase, and Cochrane databases was performed to identify comparative studies reporting outcomes for both laparoscopic and open ileocecal resection. Metaanalytical techniques were applied to identify differences in outcomes between the two groups. Sensitivity analysis was undertaken to evaluate the heterogeneity of the study.
resultsOf 20 studies identified by literature review, 15 satisfied the criteria for inclusion in the study. These included outcomes for 783 patients, 338 (43.2%) of whom had undergone laparoscopic resection, with an overall conversion rate to open surgery of 6.8%. The operative time was significantly longer in the laparoscopic group, by 29.6 min (p = 0.002), although the blood loss and complications in the two groups were similar. In terms of postoperative recovery, the laparoscopic patients had a significantly shorter time for recovery of their enteric function and a shorter hospital stay, by 2.7 days (p < 0.001).
conclusionsFor selected patients with noncomplicated ileocecal Crohn's disease, laparoscopic resection offered substantial advantages in terms of more rapid resolution of postoperative ileus and shortened hospital stay. There was no increase in complications, as compared with open surgery. The contraindications to laparoscopic approaches for Crohn's disease remain undefined.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.