Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16710323›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Microbiology2006

Listeria monocytogenes: a multifaceted model.

Mélanie Hamon, Hélène Bierne, Pascale Cossart

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Microbiology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 265 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
265citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

265 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Luteolin Inhibits Invasion ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Single-Molecule FRET-Tracking of InlB-Activated MET Receptors in Living Cells.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Microorganisms · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Peritoneal dialysis-relatedBMJ case reports · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. In Vitro Models for Investigating Intestinal Host-Pathogen Interactions.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Review

205 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mélanie HamonInstitut Pasteur, Unité des interactions Bactéries cellules, Paris 75015, France.
Hélène Bierne
Pascale Cossart

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The opportunistic intracellular pathogen Listeria monocytogenes has become a paradigm for the study of host-pathogen interactions and bacterial adaptation to mammalian hosts. Analysis of L. monocytogenes infection has provided considerable insight into how bacteria invade cells, move intracellularly, and disseminate in tissues, as well as tools to address fundamental processes in cell biology. Moreover, the vast amount of knowledge that has been gathered through in-depth comparative genomic analyses and in vivo studies makes L. monocytogenes one of the most well-studied bacterial pathogens.

Indexed as

ActinsAdaptation, PhysiologicalAnimalsBacterial ProteinsEndocytosisGene Expression Regulation, BacterialGenomicsHumansIntercellular JunctionsListeria monocytogenesListeriosisMembrane ProteinsMiceSignal TransductionVirulence FactorsActinsBacterial Proteinsinternalin protein, BacteriaMembrane ProteinsVirulence Factors

Identifiers

PMID16710323

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.