Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16709225›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of experimental pathology2006

Tumour-associated macrophages and melanoma tumourigenesis: integrating the complexity.

Mahmoud R Hussein

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of experimental pathology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 95 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Exploring association of melanoma-specific Bcl-xL with tumor immune microenvironment.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Inhibition of renalase drives tumour rejection by promoting T cell activation.European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990) · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. CCL25 Signaling in the Tumor Microenvironment.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2021
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mahmoud R HusseinDepartment of Histopathology, Assuit University Hospitals, Faculty of Medicine, Assuit University, Assuit, Egypt. mrh17@swissinfo.org
Assiut University · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When the body discovers a tumour cell (foreign antigen), several kinds of mechanisms and cells operate in what is called an immune response. The latter has evolved into two mechanisms: non-specific immunity and specific immunity, which are closely linked to and influence each other. The former represents the first line of defence against neoplastic cells. The adaptive (specific) immunity is orchestrated by antigen-specific T and B lymphocytes. The effector cells of innate immunity include granulocytes, macrophages and natural killer cells. Among these cells, macrophages represent the most important part of innate immunity against tumours. Tumour-associated macrophages (TAMs) are important antigen-presenting cells and as such an understanding of their interactions with tumour cells gives insights into novel therapeutic strategies. In tumours, the effect of TAMs is the outcome of their two concomitantly competing interactions: tumour growth reduction and tumour growth promotion. The macrophage (TAMs) content of melanoma ranges from 0 to 30% and their density increases with increasing tumour thickness. The melanoma cells and TAMs seem to interact with each other through the release of soluble factors that either prevent or enhance tumour growth. For instance, syngeneic macrophages from tumour-bearing mice can inhibit melanoma growth in the nude mice more than the control macrophages. Alternatively, metastatic B16 melanoma cells can produce some macrophage cytotoxic substances that help tumour cells not only escape the host immunosurveillance system but also prevent distant metastasis. Together, these observations suggest opposing effects for these soluble factors in melanoma. To date, little is available in the literature about the interactions between TAMs and melanoma cells. This viewpoint not only tries to examine these interactions but also provides relevant speculations.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntigen-Presenting CellsAntigens, NeoplasmHumansLymphocytes, Tumor-InfiltratingMacrophage ActivationMacrophagesMelanoma, ExperimentalMiceAntigens, Neoplasm

Identifiers

PMID16709225
PMCPMC2517364
OpenAlexW1592596551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.