Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16708289›Full record

ReviewNeuropsychology review2006

Understanding obsessive-compulsive disorder: focus on decision making.

Paolo Cavedini, Alessandra Gorini, Laura Bellodi

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Neuropsychology review, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Corticosterone accelerates behavioral inflexibility via plasticity-related gene expression in the dorsal striatum.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Planning functioning and impulsiveness in obsessive-compulsive disorder.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2018
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Obsessive-compulsive disorder: Insights from animal models.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Paolo CavediniSan Raffaele Scientific Institute, Department of Neuropsychiatric Sciences, Universitá Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Faculty of Psychology, 20 Via Stamir D'Aneona, 20127 Milan, Italy. cavedini.paolo@hsr.it
Alessandra Gorini
Laura Bellodi

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current approaches to obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) have suggested that neurobiological abnormalities play a crucial role in the etiology and course of this psychiatric illness. In particular, a fronto-subcortical circuit, including the orbitofrontal cortex, basal ganglia and thalamus appears to be involved in the expression of OCD symptoms. Neuropsychological studies have also shown that patients with OCD show deficits in cognitive abilities that are strictly linked to the functioning of the frontal lobe and its related fronto-subcortical structures, such as executive functioning deficits and insufficient cognitive-behavioral flexibility. This article focuses on decision making, an executive ability that plays a crucial role in many real-life situations, whereby individuals choose between pursuing strategies of action that involve only immediate reward and others based on long-term reward. Although the role of decision-making deficits in the evolution of OCD requires further research, the collected findings have significant implications for understanding the clinical and behavioral heterogeneity that characterizes individuals with OCD.

Indexed as

BrainDecision MakingHumansNeurobiologyNeuropsychologyObsessive-Compulsive DisorderProblem Solving

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.