Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16708071›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Genetics2006

The quest for genetic determinants of human longevity: challenges and insights.

Kaare Christensen, Thomas E Johnson, James W Vaupel

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Genetics, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 209 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
209citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

209 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. GWAS of longevity in CHARGE consortium confirms APOE and FOXO3 candidacy.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2015
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. A genome-wide association study of aging.Neurobiology of aging · 2011
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Genetic Networks of Alzheimer's Disease, Aging, and Longevity in Humans.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article

149 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kaare ChristensenEpidemiology, Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, J.B. Winslows Vej 9B, 5000 Odense C, Denmark. KChristensen@health.sdu.dk
Thomas E Johnson
James W Vaupel

Funding

TRAJECTORIES OF MORTALITY IN CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANSP01AG008761 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI ROACH, DEBORAH A · 1990 to 2008
$17.5M
NIA NIH HHS P01 AG008761
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Twin studies show that genetic differences account for about a quarter of the variance in adult human lifespan. Common polymorphisms that have a modest effect on lifespan have been identified in one gene, APOE, providing hope that other genetic determinants can be uncovered. However, although variants with substantial beneficial effects have been proposed to exist and several candidates have been put forward, their effects have yet to be confirmed. Human studies of longevity face numerous theoretical and logistical challenges, as the determinants of lifespan are extraordinarily complex. However, large-scale linkage studies of long-lived families, longitudinal candidate-gene association studies and the development of analytical methods provide the potential for future progress.

Indexed as

Genetic LinkageAllelesHumansLongevity

Identifiers

PMID16708071
PMCPMC2726954

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.