Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16706708›Full record

ArticleAIDS patient care and STDs2006

To take or not to take: decision-making about antiretroviral treatment in people living with HIV/AIDS.

Heidemarie Kremer, Gail Ironson, Neil Schneiderman, Martin Hautzinger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AIDS patient care and STDs, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Asthma medication adherence: the role of God and other health locus of control factors.Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology · 2013
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Medication-related barriers to entering HIV care.AIDS patient care and STDs · 2012
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Heidemarie KremerDepartment of Psychology, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA. HKremer@miami.edu
Gail Ironson
Neil Schneiderman
Martin Hautzinger

Funding

Psychobiological Processes and Health in HIV/AIDSR01MH066697 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI CORAL GABLES · PI IRONSON, GAIL H · 2003 to 2007
$2.6M
PSYCHOLOGY OF HEALTH AND LONG SURVIVAL WITH AIDSR01MH053791 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI CORAL GABLES · PI IRONSON, GAIL H · 1996 to 2000
$310k
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH066697NIMH NIH HHS R01MH066697NIMH NIH HHS R01MH53791
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Knowledge is limited regarding decision-making about antiretroviral treatment (ART) from the patient's perspective. This substudy of a longitudinal study of psychobiologic aspects of long-term survival, conducted in 2003, compares the rationales of HIV-positive individuals (n = 79) deciding to take or not to take ART. Inclusion criteria were HIV/AIDS symptoms, or CD4 nadir less than 350, or viral load greater than 55,000. Those not meeting any criteria for receiving ART (2/2003 U.S. DHHS treatment guidelines) were excluded. Diagnosis was on average 11 years ago; 36% were female, 42% African American, 28% Latino, 24% white, and 6% other. Qualitative content analysis of semistructured interviews identified 10 criteria for the decision to take or not to take ART: CD4/viral load counts (87%), quality of life (85%), knowledge/ beliefs about resistance (66%), mind-body beliefs (65%), adverse effects of ART (59%), easy-to-take regimen (58%), spirituality/worldview (58%), drug resistance (41%), experience of HIV/AIDS symptoms (39%), and preference for complementary/alternative medicine (17%). Participants choosing not to take ART (27%) preferred complementary/alternative medicine (r = 0.43, p = 0.001)1, perceived a better quality of life without ART (r = 0.32, p < 0.004), and weighted avoidance of adverse effects of ART more heavily (r = 0.24, p < 0.030) than participants taking ART (73%). Demographic characteristics related to taking ART were having a partner (r = 0.31, p < 0.008) and having health insurance (r = 0.26, p< 0.040). Decisions to take or not to take ART depend not only on patient medical characteristics, but also on individual beliefs about ART, complementary/alternative medicine, spirituality, and mind-body connection. HIV-positive individuals declining treatment place more weight on alternative medicine, avoiding adverse effects and perceiving a better quality of life through not taking ART.

Indexed as

Decision MakingPatient ComplianceAdultAnti-Retroviral AgentsCD4 Lymphocyte CountComplementary TherapiesCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFloridaHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHIV InfectionsHumansInsurance, HealthLongitudinal StudiesMaleSpousesAnti-Retroviral Agents

Identifiers

PMID16706708
PMCPMC2614875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.