Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16705493›Full record

ArticleJournal of occupational rehabilitation2006

Return to work expectation predicts work in chronic musculoskeletal and behavioral health disorders: prospective study with clinical implications.

Bodil Heijbel, Malin Josephson, Irene Jensen, Stefan Stark, Eva Vingård

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of occupational rehabilitation, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Disease-generic factors of work participation of workers with a chronic disease: a systematic review.International archives of occupational and environmental health · 2015
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Bodil HeijbelSection for Personal Injury Prevention, Karolinska Institutet, Box 12718, SE-112 94 Stockholm, Sweden. bodil.heijbel@ki.se
Malin Josephson
Irene Jensen
Stefan Stark
Eva Vingård

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

designProspective cohort study with 18-month follow-up.

objectiveTo investigate if long-term sick listed persons' own predictions of their future return to work (RTW) have an impact on their RTW when controlling for other established factors.

methodPostal questionnaires at baseline were sent to persons who had been on sick leave for more than 90 days, and were employed in five municipalities and four county councils in Sweden. A follow-up regarding their RTW was performed 18 months later.

resultsAfter 18 months 135 out of 508 persons (27%) had returned to work, full or part-time. In a multivariate logistic regression, the sick listed persons' own prediction of their RTW proved to be highly significant (OR=8.28, 95% CI: 3.31-20.69). Only six out of 132 persons with a negative view of their RTW did return to wok. Other predictive factors that were found for RTW were: being on sick leave for a period of less than 1 year (OR=2.09, 95% CI: 1.19-3.67), having less pain than persons in the quartile with most pain (OR=2.65, 95% CI: 1.21-5.81), perceiving that one was welcome back to work (OR=1.98, 95% CI: 1.10-3.58), and being under 55 years of age (OR=2.37, 95% CI: 1.07-5.23 for age between 45 and 54 years and the same trend for age below 45 years OR=1.85, 95% CI: 0.82-4.20).

conclusionPersons with a positive prediction should get help to realise their potential for RTW. Offering traditional rehabilitation measures to a person with a negative prediction of his/her RTW, could be a waste of resources if done ahead of improving self-confidence and view of what is possible. The problems in this group might decrease or be easier to handle if decisions about the future are taken within a year.

Indexed as

Attitude to HealthEmploymentSick LeaveAdultAge FactorsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementProspective StudiesSurveys and QuestionnairesSweden

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.