Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16705004›Full record

ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2006

Impact of specialty of admitting physician and type of hospital on care and outcome for myocardial infarction in England and Wales during 2004-5: observational study.

John S Birkhead, Clive Weston, Derek Lowe

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01359033 (Compare the Patient Risk and Between-hospital Variation in Myocardial Infarction Mortality in the United Kingdom and Sweden), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01359033 completednot on this mapstarted 2011, after this paper: background citation

Compare the Patient Risk and Between-hospital Variation in Myocardial Infarction Mortality in the United Kingdom and Sweden

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity College, LondonRan2011 to 2014Enrolled510,863ConditionsAcute Myocardial Infarction
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Acute coronary syndromes: an old age problem.Journal of geriatric cardiology : JGC · 2012
    Article
  15. Quality of acute coronary care in emerging economies.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2009
    Article
  16. Data sources and performance measurement.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2007
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Acute coronary syndrome.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2007
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

John S BirkheadNorthampton General Hospital, Northampton, NN1 5BD. John.birkhead@btinternet.com
Clive Weston
Derek Lowe
Northampton General Hospital · GBRoyal College of Physicians · GBSingleton Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo examine process of care and outcome for patients admitted with acute myocardial infarction to hospitals in England and Wales in relation to type of consultant care and type of hospital.

designObservational study of 88,782 patients admitted with myocardial infarction during 2004-5, using records from the national audit of myocardial infarction project (MINAP) database. OUTCOME MEASURES: Use of reperfusion treatment and secondary prevention drugs, use of angiography, and 90 day mortality of patients admitted under the care of cardiologists and non-cardiologists in hospitals with and without facilities for coronary intervention.

findings36% of patients were admitted under the care of a cardiologist and 20% to a hospital with coronary interventional facilities. Patients admitted under cardiologists had fewer comorbidities than other patients and were more likely to have reperfusion treatment (12,266/14,433 (85%) v 13,682/17,064 (80%)) and appropriate secondary prevention drugs. Overall, 27,431/79,374 (35%) of patients had angiography. Relatively more patients admitted to interventional hospitals (8167/14,661; 56%) than to other hospitals had angiography (19,264/64,713; 30%). The adjusted risk of death by 90 days for patients treated in interventional compared with non-interventional hospitals was 0.93 (95% confidence interval 0.82 to 1.06). The adjusted risk of death at 90 days for patients admitted under cardiologists compared with non-cardiologists was 0.86 (0.81 to 0.91).

conclusionsPatients cared for by cardiologists had less comorbidity than other patients. They were more likely to receive proved treatments and angiography, and they had a lower adjusted 90 day mortality. Large differences existed in the use of angiography between interventional and non-interventional hospitals. These findings show wide variations in the management and outcome of patients with myocardial infarction in England and Wales.

Indexed as

SpecializationAgedAged, 80 and overCardiotonic AgentsConsultantsCoronary AngiographyEnglandHospitalizationHospitalsHumansMedical Staff, HospitalMedicineMiddle AgedMyocardial InfarctionMyocardial ReperfusionOutcome and Process Assessment, Health CareCardiotonic Agents

Identifiers

PMID16705004
PMCPMC1473062
OpenAlexW2029412045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.