Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16704777›Full record

ArticleEmerging infectious diseases2006

Clostridium difficile infection in patients discharged from US short-stay hospitals, 1996-2003.

L Clifford McDonald, Maria Owings, Daniel B Jernigan

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Emerging infectious diseases, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 259 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
259citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02255305 phase2terminatednot on this mapstarted 2015, after this paper: background citation

Fecal Microbiota Transplantation Versus Standard Medical Therapy for Initial Treatment of Recurrent Clostridium Difficile Infection

TypeinterventionalSponsorEndeavor HealthRan2015 to 2020Enrolled6ConditionsClostridium Difficile InfectionArmsFMT, Antimicrobials
NCT05320068 phase3completednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Phase III,randomized,double-blinded Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Effectiveness and Safety of Oral Vancomycin Vs Placebo in the Prevention of Recurrence of C.difficile Infection in Patients Under Treatment with Systemic Antibiotic Therapy

TypeinterventionalSponsorJulia OrígüenRan2022 to 2024Enrolled24ConditionsClostridioides Difficile InfectionArmsOral Vancomycin, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

259 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Global burden ofJournal of global health · 2019
    Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Decreased cure and increased recurrence rates for Clostridium difficile infection caused by the epidemic C. difficile BI strain.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2012
    Trial
  11. Article
  12. Global burden and trends of theAnnals of medicine · 2025
    Observational
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Novel phenylthiazoles with aRSC advances · 2024
    Article
  17. Probiotics: insights and new opportunities forCritical reviews in microbiology · 2023
    Review
  18. Evidence of within-facility patient-patientEpidemiology and infection · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

199 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

L Clifford McDonaldCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia 30333, USA. CMcDonald1@cdc.gov
Maria Owings
Daniel B Jernigan

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

US hospital discharges for which Clostridium difficile-associated disease (CDAD) was listed as any diagnosis doubled from 82,000 (95% confidence interval [CI] 71,000-94,000) or 31/100,000 population in 1996 to 178,000 (95% CI 151,000-205,000) or 61/100,000 in 2003; this increase was significant between 2000 and 2003 (slope of linear trend 9.48; 95% CI 6.16-12.80, p = 0.01). The overall rate during this period was severalfold higher in persons >65 years of age (228/100,000) than in the age group with the next highest rate, 45-64 years (40/100,000; p < or = 0.001). CDAD appears to be increasing rapidly in the United States and is disproportionately affecting older persons. Clinicians should be aware of the increasing risk for CDAD and make efforts to control transmission of C. difficile and prevent disease.

Indexed as

Clostridioides difficileHospitalizationLength of StayPatient DischargeAdolescentAdultAgedAgingEnterocolitis, PseudomembranousFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRisk FactorsTime FactorsUnited States

Identifiers

PMID16704777
PMCPMC3291455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.