Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16703334›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2006

Newspaper coverage of complementary and alternative therapies for cancer--UK 2002-2004.

Stefania Milazzo, Edzard Ernst

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Trick or treat? Australian newspaper portrayal of complementary and alternative medicine for the treatment of cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2011
    Article
  6. Perplexity analysis of obesity news coverage.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2009
    Article
  7. Comprehensive analysis of cancer coverage in important Chinese newspapers between 2000 and 2007.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2009
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Herbal medicine: buy one, get two free.Postgraduate medical journal · 2007
    Article
  12. Presenting the alternative: cancer and complementary and alternative medicine in the Canadian print media.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2007
    Article
  13. Popular health advice: entertainment or risk factor?The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2007
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Stefania MilazzoComplementary Medicine, Peninsula Medical School, Universities of Exeter & Plymouth, Institute of Health & Social Care, Exeter, UK.
Edzard Ernst

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundComplementary and alternative therapies (CATs) are increasingly being used by cancer patients. These patients often rely on information retrieved from the lay press, which can affect their choices towards unconventional treatments for their disease. In this study, we aimed at assessing UK newspapers' coverage of CATs for cancer.

methodsThe "Lexis Nexis" database was searched for 3-month periods in 2002, 2003 and 2004. The search terms were combined: "complementary OR alternative AND medicine OR therapy AND cancer". CATs were grouped and articles' contents were assessed according to predefined criteria.

resultsA total of 310 articles were found: 117 came from national newspapers; 193 came from local newspaper issues. The UK press showed an increasing interest towards CATs for cancer (in 2002, 81 articles; in 2003, 82 articles and in 2004, 147 articles). The most frequently mentioned alternative therapies were diets and supplements (17.7%). Articles mainly focused on CATs as possible cancer treatments (44.8%), and 53.4% of all CATs mentioned were not backed up by trial data. The tone of the articles was generally positive towards CATs. Promotional articles increased over the years, especially for cancer centres and clinics.

conclusionUK national newspapers frequently publish articles on CATs for cancer. Much of this information seems to be uncritical with a potential for misleading patients.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicComplementary TherapiesHumansInformation DisseminationNeoplasmsNewspapers as TopicUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.