Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16702420›Full record

ArticleGenetics2006

Transcriptionally silenced transgenes in maize are activated by three mutations defective in paramutation.

Karen M McGinnis, Catherine Springer, Yan Lin, Charles C Carey, Vicki Chandler

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Exploring the secrets of long noncoding RNAs.International journal of molecular sciences · 2015
    Review
  7. Epigenetic silencing in transgenic plants.Frontiers in plant science · 2015
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Paramutagenicity of a p1 epiallele in maize.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2013
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. RNA-mediated trans-communication can establish paramutation at the b1 locus in maize.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2010
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Distinct size distribution of endogeneous siRNAs in maize: Evidence from deep sequencing in the mop1-1 mutant.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2008
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Karen M McGinnisDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721, USA.
Catherine Springer
Yan Lin
Charles C Carey
Vicki Chandler
University of Arizona · USFred Hutch Cancer Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plants with mutations in one of three maize genes, mop1, rmr1, and rmr2, are defective in paramutation, an allele-specific interaction that leads to meiotically heritable chromatin changes. Experiments reported here demonstrate that these genes are required to maintain the transcriptional silencing of two different transgenes, suggesting that paramutation and transcriptional silencing of transgenes share mechanisms. We hypothesize that the transgenes are silenced through an RNA-directed chromatin mechanism, because mop1 encodes an RNA-dependent RNA polymerase. In all the mutants, DNA methylation was reduced in the active transgenes relative to the silent transgenes at all of the CNG sites monitored within the transgene promoter. However, asymmetrical methylation persisted at one site within the reactivated transgene in the rmr1-1 mutant. With that one mutant, rmr1-1, the transgene was efficiently resilenced upon outcrossing to reintroduce the wild-type protein. In contrast, with the mop1-1 and rmr2-1 mutants, the transgene remained active in a subset of progeny even after the wild-type proteins were reintroduced by outcrossing. Interestingly, this immunity to silencing increased as the generations progressed, consistent with a heritable chromatin state being formed at the transgene in plants carrying the mop1-1 and rmr2-1 mutations that becomes more resistant to silencing in subsequent generations.

Indexed as

Gene SilencingMutationTranscription, GeneticTransgenesCrosses, GeneticDNA MethylationModels, GeneticZea mays

Identifiers

PMID16702420
PMCPMC1526669
OpenAlexW2101359530

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.