Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16702410›Full record

ArticleGenome research2006

Widespread genome duplications throughout the history of flowering plants.

Liying Cui, P Kerr Wall, James H Leebens-Mack, Bruce G Lindsay, Douglas E Soltis, Jeff J Doyle, Pamela S Soltis, John E Carlson, Kathiravetpilla Arumuganathan, Abdelali Barakat and 3 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 292 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
292citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

292 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 751 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A robust 1K-core marker set for wild germplasm management and targeted pre-breeding of rice: development and applications.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. High-qualityHorticulture research · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Convergent Patterns of Karyotype Evolution Underlying Karyotype Uniformity in Conifers.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  20. Article

232 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Liying CuiDepartment of Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park 16802, USA.
P Kerr Wall
James H Leebens-Mack
Bruce G Lindsay
Douglas E Soltis
Jeff J Doyle
Pamela S Soltis
John E Carlson
Kathiravetpilla Arumuganathan
Abdelali Barakat
Victor A Albert
Hong Ma
Claude W dePamphilis
Pennsylvania State University · USCornell University · USFlorida Museum of Natural History · USUniversity of Oslo · NOVirginia Mason Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genomic comparisons provide evidence for ancient genome-wide duplications in a diverse array of animals and plants. We developed a birth-death model to identify evidence for genome duplication in EST data, and applied a mixture model to estimate the age distribution of paralogous pairs identified in EST sets for species representing the basal-most extant flowering plant lineages. We found evidence for episodes of ancient genome-wide duplications in the basal angiosperm lineages including Nuphar advena (yellow water lily: Nymphaeaceae) and the magnoliids Persea americana (avocado: Lauraceae), Liriodendron tulipifera (tulip poplar: Magnoliaceae), and Saruma henryi (Aristolochiaceae). In addition, we detected independent genome duplications in the basal eudicot Eschscholzia californica (California poppy: Papaveraceae) and the basal monocot Acorus americanus (Acoraceae), both of which were distinct from duplications documented for ancestral grass (Poaceae) and core eudicot lineages. Among gymnosperms, we found equivocal evidence for ancient polyploidy in Welwitschia mirabilis (Gnetales) and no evidence for polyploidy in pine, although gymnosperms generally have much larger genomes than the angiosperms investigated. Cross-species sequence divergence estimates suggest that synonymous substitution rates in the basal angiosperms are less than half those previously reported for core eudicots and members of Poaceae. These lower substitution rates permit inference of older duplication events. We hypothesize that evidence of an ancient duplication observed in the Nuphar data may represent a genome duplication in the common ancestor of all or most extant angiosperms, except Amborella.

Indexed as

Gene DuplicationGenome, PlantCycadopsidaEvolution, MolecularMagnoliopsidaModels, GeneticModels, StatisticalPhylogenyPolyploidy

Identifiers

PMID16702410
PMCPMC1479859
OpenAlexW2169335408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.