Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16688527›Full record

ReviewMammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society2006

Epigenetics and phenotypic variation in mammals.

Anne E Peaston, Emma Whitelaw

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Implication of the Mediterranean diet on the human epigenome.Journal of preventive medicine and hygiene · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Histone Methylation Regulation in Neurodegenerative Disorders.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. DuplicatedGenes · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Anne E PeastonSchool of Molecular and Microbial Biosciences, The University of Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia. anne.peaston@jax.org
Emma Whitelaw

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

What causes phenotypic variation? By now it is clear that phenotype is a result of the interaction between genotype and environment, in addition to variation not readily attributable to either. Epigenetic phenomena associated with phenotypic variation at the biochemical, cellular, tissue, and organism level are now well recognized and are likely to contribute to the "intangible variation" alluded to. While it is clear that epigenetic modifications are mitotically heritable, the fidelity of this process is not well understood. Inheritance through more than one generation of meioses is even less well studied. So it remains unclear to what extent epigenetic changes contribute to phenotypic variation in natural populations. How might such evidence be obtained? What are the features of phenotypes that might suggest an epigenetic component? How much of the epigenetic component is truly independent of genetic changes? The answers to such questions must come from studies designed specifically to detect subtle, stochastically determined phenotypic variation in suitable animal models.

Indexed as

PhenotypeAdaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingAnimalsCarrier ProteinsDNA MethylationEnvironmental ExposureEpigenesis, GeneticFemaleGenetic VariationGenomicsHumansMaleMutL Protein Homolog 1Nuclear ProteinsAdaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingCarrier ProteinsMLH1 protein, humanMutL Protein Homolog 1Nuclear Proteins

Identifiers

PMID16688527
PMCPMC3906716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.