Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16688202›Full record

Trial reportJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2006

Work of breathing using high-flow nasal cannula in preterm infants.

J G Saslow, Z H Aghai, T A Nakhla, J J Hart, R Lawrysh, G E Stahl, K H Pyon

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 45 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00609882 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2007, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of Humidified High Flow Nasal Cannula to Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure for Non-Invasive Respiratory Support in Neonates

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of UtahRan2007 to 2012Enrolled420ConditionsRespiratory InsufficiencyArmsNasal CPAP, Humidified High Flow Nasal Cannula (HHFNC)
NCT03592134 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Choice and Optimal Settings of Non Invasive Respiratory Support in Preterm Newborns < 30 Gestational Weeks

TypeobservationalSponsorHôpital Necker-Enfants MaladesRan2018 to 2018Enrolled60ConditionsPreterm Infant, Respiratory Distress SyndromeArmsesophageal pressure measurement
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 208 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. High flow nasal cannula for respiratory support in term infants.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. High flow nasal cannula for respiratory support in preterm infants.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Pooled it
  3. Physiological effects of high-flow nasal cannula therapy in preterm infants.Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition · 2020
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. High-flow nasal cannula and extubation success in the premature infant: a comparison of two modalities.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2010
    Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. The effects of flow settings during high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy for neonates and young children.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2024
    Review
  9. Nasal high flow therapy for primary respiratory support in preterm infants.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Mechanisms of nasal high flow therapy in newborns.Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

J G SaslowDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, The Children's Regional Hospital at Cooper University Hospital, Camden, NJ 08103, USA. saslow-judy@cooperhealth.edu
Z H Aghai
T A Nakhla
J J Hart
R Lawrysh
G E Stahl
K H Pyon
Cooper University Hospital · USRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare the work of breathing (WOB) in premature neonates supported with high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) and nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP). STUDY

designEighteen preterm neonates <2.0 kg on HFNC or NCPAP support were studied in a random order. A ventilator was used to deliver 6 cm H2O of NCPAP with nasal prongs. High-flow nasal cannula delivered with Vapotherm (VAPO) at 3, 4 and 5 l/min was used. Tidal ventilation was obtained using respiratory inductance plethysmography calibrated with face-mask pneumotachography. An esophageal balloon estimated pleural pressure from which changes in end distending pressure were calculated. Inspiratory, elastic and resistive WOB and respiratory parameters were calculated.

resultsNo differences were found in the WOB for all settings. Changes in end distending pressure did not vary significantly over all device settings except VAPO at 5 l/min.

conclusionIn these preterm infants with mild respiratory illness, HFNC provided support comparable to NCPAP.

Indexed as

Oxygen Inhalation TherapyWork of BreathingContinuous Positive Airway PressureHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureInfant, Premature, DiseasesLung ComplianceRespirationRespiratory MechanicsRespiratory Tract DiseasesTidal Volume

Identifiers

PMID16688202
OpenAlexW1972993288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.