ArticleThe Canadian journal of cardiology2006
True versus reported waiting times for valvular aortic stenosis surgery.
Article in The Canadian journal of cardiology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prognostic Value of Right Ventricular Dysfunction and Tricuspid Regurgitation in Patients with Severe Low-Flow Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis.Scientific reports · 2019Observational
- How established wait time benchmarks significantly underestimate total wait times for cardiac surgery.The Canadian journal of cardiology · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo produce a universally accepted waiting time definition for cardiovascular surgery, present the rationale for this definition, and compare data on current waiting times in British Columbia based on this definition versus the current definition in patients waiting for aortic stenosis surgery. STUDY
designThe present study is a retrospective data analysis.
settingThe fixed-dollar, single-payer health care delivery system in British Columbia. PATIENTS: All residents of British Columbia who were at least 22 years of age and who were placed on a waiting list for aortic valve surgery with the diagnosis of aortic stenosis between January 1, 1991, and December 31, 2000, were eligible for the present study.
interventionsDates of physician visits, procedures and surgery were obtained from the British Columbia Cardiac Registries and Medical Services Plan databases. True waiting times from physician visits to procedures and surgery were calculated.
resultsOf the 2516 patients booked for aortic valve surgery with a primary diagnosis of aortic stenosis, 2237 subjects (88.9%) were eligible for analysis after exclusions. The eligible patients ranged in age from 22 to 95 years, and 36.8% were female. The true median waiting time was 243 days (148 days [25th percentile], 397 days [75th percentile]), which was 3.2 times the interval currently reported as the waiting time (75 days [42, 127]). Thirty-nine patients died while waiting for surgery. Patients used more resources while waiting for surgery than after surgery.
conclusionsTrue waiting times for surgery for aortic stenosis in British Columbia are significantly longer than reported waiting times. The authors propose that the wait list time for cardiovascular surgery be redefined as "the time interval between the patient's first contact with a medical care provider with symptoms or signs which ultimately lead to cardiovascular surgery and the date of that surgery".
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.