ArticleThe world journal of biological psychiatry : the official journal of the World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry2006
Addressing the limitations of the CATIE study.
Article in The world journal of biological psychiatry : the official journal of the World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sex Differences Between Female and Male Individuals in Antipsychotic Efficacy and Adverse Effects in the Treatment of Schizophrenia.CNS drugs · 2024Trial
- Five-year trend of antipsychotic prescription practices in a district Hospital in Ghana: A retrospective study.Neuropsychopharmacology reports · 2023Article
- Revisiting Antipsychotic-induced Akathisia: Current Issues and Prospective Challenges.Current neuropharmacology · 2017Review
- EPA guidance on improving the image of psychiatry.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2016Article
- Does olanzapine warrant clinical pharmacokinetic monitoring in schizophrenia?Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2011Review
- Effectiveness studies: advantages and disadvantages.Dialogues in clinical neuroscience · 2011Review
- Do effectiveness ("real world") studies on antipsychotics tell us the real truth?European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2008Review
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
16684687What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.