Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16682960›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology2006

Intrathecal treatment with sigma1 receptor antagonists reduces formalin-induced phosphorylation of NMDA receptor subunit 1 and the second phase of formalin test in mice.

Hyun-Woo Kim, Young-Bae Kwon, Dae-Hyun Roh, Seo-Yeon Yoon, Ho-Jae Han, Kee-Won Kim, Alvin J Beitz, Jang-Hern Lee

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of pharmacology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 99 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. NovelMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Hyun-Woo KimDepartment of Veterinary Physiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Seoul National University, Sillim-dong, Gwanak-gu, South Korea.
Young-Bae Kwon
Dae-Hyun Roh
Seo-Yeon Yoon
Ho-Jae Han
Kee-Won Kim
Alvin J Beitz
Jang-Hern Lee
Seoul National University · KRJeonbuk National University · KRChonnam National University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although previous reports have suggested that the sigma 1 (sigma(1)) receptor may be involved in pain sensation, its specific site of action has not been elucidated. The aim of present study was to determine the role of the spinal sigma(1) receptor in formalin-induced pain behavior, spinal cord Fos expression and phosphorylation of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor subunit 1 (pNR1). Intrathecal (i.t.) pretreatment with the selective sigma(1) receptor antagonist, BD-1047 (N-[2-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)ethyl]-N-methyl-2-(dimethylamino)ethylamine dihydrobromide) (10-100 nmol) dose dependently reduced formalin-induced pain behaviors in second phase, but not first phase, of the formalin test. I.t. injection of BD-1047 also reduced formalin-evoked Fos expression and pNR1 at the protein kinase C-dependent site, serine-896 (Ser896) and the protein kinase A-dependent site, serine-897 (Ser897) in spinal dorsal horn.i.t. BMY-14802 ((alpha-(4-fluorophenyl)-4-(5-fluoro-2-pyrimidinyl)-1-piperazinebutanol hydrochloride) (10-100 nmol, sigma(1) receptor antagonist and 5-HT(1A) receptor agonist) dose dependently reduced formalin-induced pain behaviors in both phases. However, the 5-HT(1A) receptor might not be involved in the antinociceptive effect of BMY-14802 on the second phase, since i.t. pretreatment with the 5-HT(1A) receptor antagonist propranolol ((S)-1-isopropylamino-3-(1-naphthyloxy)-2-propanol hydrochloride) (injected 10 min prior to i.t. BMY-14802) partially blocked the effect of BMY-14802 on the first phase of the formalin test but did not affect the inhibitory effect of BMY-14802 on the second phase. In addition, i.t. BMY-14802 significantly reduced formalin-evoked Fos expression and pNR1 (Ser896 and Ser897) expression in spinal dorsal horn. The results of this study suggest that selective blockage of spinal sigma(1) receptors can reduce pain behaviors, spinal cord Fos expression and pNR1 (Ser896 and Ser897) expression associated with the second phase of the formalin test.

Indexed as

Pain MeasurementAnimalsEthylenediaminesFormaldehydeInjections, IntraventricularMaleMiceMice, Inbred ICRMotor ActivityPhosphorylationPosterior Horn CellsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-fosPyrimidinesReceptor, Serotonin, 5-HT1AReceptors, N-Methyl-D-AspartateReceptors, sigmaalpha-(4-fluorophenyl)-4-(5-fluoro-2-pyrimidinyl)-1-piperazine butanolEthylenediaminesFormaldehydeN-(2-(3,4-Dichlorphenyl)ethyl)-N,N',N'-trimethyl-1,2-ethandiaminNR1 NMDA receptorProto-Oncogene Proteins c-fosPyrimidinesReceptor, Serotonin, 5-HT1AReceptors, N-Methyl-D-AspartateReceptors, sigma

Identifiers

PMID16682960
PMCPMC1751783
OpenAlexW1758779245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.