Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16680195›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2006

Genome-wide survey for biologically functional pseudogenes.

Orjan Svensson, Lars Arvestad, Jens Lagergren

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Pseudogenes: Four Decades of Discovery.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021
    Article
  4. Pseudogenes and Their Genome-Wide Prediction in Plants.International journal of molecular sciences · 2016
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. "Orphan" retrogenes in the human genome.Molecular biology and evolution · 2013
    Article
  12. The GENCODE pseudogene resource.Genome biology · 2012
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Orjan SvenssonStockholm Bioinformatics Centre, Royal Institute of Technology, Albanova University Center, Stockholm, Sweden. osv@sbc.su.se
Lars Arvestad
Jens Lagergren
KTH Royal Institute of Technology · SEAlbaNova · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

According to current estimates there exist about 20,000 pseudogenes in a mammalian genome. The vast majority of these are disabled and nonfunctional copies of protein-coding genes which, therefore, evolve neutrally. Recent findings that a Makorin1 pseudogene, residing on mouse Chromosome 5, is, indeed, in vivo vital and also evolutionarily preserved, encouraged us to conduct a genome-wide survey for other functional pseudogenes in human, mouse, and chimpanzee. We identify to our knowledge the first examples of conserved pseudogenes common to human and mouse, originating from one duplication predating the human-mouse species split and having evolved as pseudogenes since the species split. Functionality is one possible way to explain the apparently contradictory properties of such pseudogene pairs, i.e., high conservation and ancient origin. The hypothesis of functionality is tested by comparing expression evidence and synteny of the candidates with proper test sets. The tests suggest potential biological function. Our candidate set includes a small set of long-lived pseudogenes whose unknown potential function is retained since before the human-mouse species split, and also a larger group of primate-specific ones found from human-chimpanzee searches. Two processed sequences are notable, their conservation since the human-mouse split being as high as most protein-coding genes; one is derived from the protein Ataxin 7-like 3 (ATX7NL3), and one from the Spinocerebellar ataxia type 1 protein (ATX1). Our approach is comparative and can be applied to any pair of species. It is implemented by a semi-automated pipeline based on cross-species BLAST comparisons and maximum-likelihood phylogeny estimations. To separate pseudogenes from protein-coding genes, we use standard methods, utilizing in-frame disablements, as well as a probabilistic filter based on Ka/Ks ratios.

Indexed as

GenomicsAnimalsBase SequenceConserved SequenceEvolution, MolecularGene ExpressionGenomeHumansLikelihood FunctionsMiceMolecular Sequence DataPan troglodytesPhylogenyPseudogenesRNA, MessengerSequence AlignmentRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID16680195
PMCPMC1456316
OpenAlexW2016170092

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.