Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16679410›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2006

Hydrodynamic narrowing of tubes extruded from cells.

F Brochard-Wyart, N Borghi, D Cuvelier, P Nassoy

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 125 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Biomechanics of Neutrophil Tethers.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

F Brochard-WyartLaboratoire Physicochimie Curie, Institut Curie/Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Unité Mixte de Recherche 168, 11, rue Pierre et Marie Curie, 75231 Paris Cedex 5, France. francoise.brochard-wyart@curie.fr
N Borghi
D Cuvelier
P Nassoy
Institut Curie · FRPhysique des Cellules et Cancers · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We discuss the pulling force f required to extrude a lipid tube from a living cell as a function of the extrusion velocity L. The main feature is membrane friction on the cytoskeleton. As recently observed for neutrophils, the tether force exhibits a "shear thinning" response over a large range of pulling velocities, which was previously interpreted by assuming viscoelastic flows of the sliding membrane. Here, we propose an alternative explanation based on purely Newtonian flow: The diameter of the tether decreases concomitantly with the increase of the membrane tension in the lipid tube. The pulling force is found to vary as L(1/3), which is consistent with reported experimental data for various types of cells.

Indexed as

ElasticityModels, BiologicalStress, MechanicalBiophysical PhenomenaBiophysicsCell MembraneCytoskeletonMathematicsMembrane FluidityMembrane LipidsMicromanipulationSurface TensionThermodynamicsViscosityMembrane Lipids

Identifiers

PMID16679410
PMCPMC1472501
OpenAlexW2022436228

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.