Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16679350›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical pathology2006

Expression profiling and prediction of distant metastases in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

B J M Braakhuis, A Senft, R de Bree, J de Vries, B Ylstra, J Cloos, D J Kuik, C R Leemans, R H Brakenhoff

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical pathology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Alterations in the CaExploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy · 2021
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Molecular diagnostic alterations in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck and potential diagnostic applications.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2014
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

B J M BraakhuisDepartment of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. bjm.braakhuis@vumc.nl
A Senft
R de Bree
J de Vries
B Ylstra
J Cloos
D J Kuik
C R Leemans
R H Brakenhoff

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFor breast and prostate cancer, a gene expression signature of the tumour is associated with the development of distant metastases. Regarding head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), the only known risk factor is the presence of > or =3 tumour-positive lymph nodes.

aimTo evaluate whether a HNSCC gene expression signature can discriminate between the patients with and without distant metastases.

methodsPatients with HNSCC with and without distant metastases had >3 tumour-positive lymph nodes, and did not differ with respect to other risk factors. Statistical analysis was carried out using Student's t test, as well as statistical analysis of microarrays (SAM), to assess the false discovery rate for each gene. These analyses were supplemented with a newly developed method that computed deviations from gaussian-order statistics (DEGOS). To validate the platform, normal mucosa of the head and neck was included as control.

results2963 genes were differently expressed between HNSCC and normal mucosa (t test; p<0.01). More rigorous statistical analysis with SAM confirmed the differential expression of most genes. The comparison of genes in HNSCC with and without metastases showed 150 differently expressed genes (t test; p<0.01), none of which, however, could be confirmed using SAM or DEGOS.

conclusionsNo evidence for a metastasis signature is found, and gene expression profiling of HNSCC has seemingly no value in determining the risk of developing distant metastases. The absence of such a signature can be understood when it is realised that, for HNSCC in contrast with breast cancer, the lymph nodes are a necessary in-between station for haematogenous spread.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAlcohol DrinkingCarcinoma, Squamous CellCase-Control StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGene Expression ProfilingHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansLymphatic MetastasisMaleMiddle AgedRisk FactorsSmoking

Identifiers

PMID16679350
PMCPMC1860543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.