Trial reportThe Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences2006
Lercanidipine and losartan effects on blood pressure and fibrinolytic parameters.
Trial report in The Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hyperinflammation and derangement of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system in COVID-19: A novel hypothesis for clinically suspected hypercoagulopathy and microvascular immunothrombosis.Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antihypertensive agents may modulate fibrinolysis in addition to reducing blood pressure. We conducted a randomized trial to assess the effects of lercanidipine and losartan on blood pressure (BP) lowering and three fibrinolytic parameters: plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1), D-dimer, and fibrinogen. All patients enrolled had essential hypertension and underwent a placebo run-in period of 2 weeks before randomization to either lercanidipine tablets 10-20 mg once daily or losartan tablets 50-100 mg once daily. Twenty-six patients completed this study. After 8 weeks of treatment, both groups of patients had significantly reduced systolic (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) (SBP, p = 0.034 and 0.050, respectively; DBP, p = 0.018 and 0.034 for lercanidipine and losartan, respectively). Both drugs were well tolerated. Only in the group treated with lercanidipine was PAI-1 concentration significantly reduced (57.1 +/- 4.7 to 43.1 +/- 4.8 ng/mL, p = 0.047). No difference was found with D-dimer and fibrinogen in either group. This study shows that both lercanidipine and losartan are effective antihypertensive drugs in patients with essential hypertension. Lercanidipine may provide additional benefit in fibrinolysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.