ArticleBMC cancer2006
An informatics model for tissue banks--lessons learned from the Cooperative Prostate Cancer Tissue Resource.
Article in BMC cancer, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.
- REDCap and the National Mesothelioma Virtual Bank-a scalable and sustainable model for rare disease biorepositories.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2023Article
- Enabling Precision Medicine in Cancer Care Through a Molecular Data Warehouse: The Moffitt Experience.JCO clinical cancer informatics · 2021Article
- Big Data: the challenge for small research groups in the era of cancer genomics.British journal of cancer · 2015Review
- National Mesothelioma Virtual Bank: A Platform for Collaborative Research and Mesothelioma Biobanking Resource to Support Translational Research.Lung cancer international · 2013Article
- National Biobank of Korea: Quality control Programs of Collected-human Biospecimens.Osong public health and research perspectives · 2012Article
- The liver tissue bank and clinical database in China.Frontiers of medicine in China · 2010Article
- Design and utilization of the colorectal and pancreatic neoplasm virtual biorepository: An early detection research network initiative.Journal of pathology informatics · 2010Article
- Clinical features and outcomes of 25 patients with primary adenosquamous cell carcinoma of the prostate.Rare tumors · 2010Article
- A decade of experience in the development and implementation of tissue banking informatics tools for intra and inter-institutional translational research.Journal of pathology informatics · 2010Article
- IT Infrastructure Components for Biobanking.Applied clinical informatics · 2010Article
- An informatics supported web-based data annotation and query tool to expedite translational research for head and neck malignancies.BMC cancer · 2009Article
- Article
- National Mesothelioma Virtual Bank: a standard based biospecimen and clinical data resource to enhance translational research.BMC cancer · 2008Article
- Article
- A novel cross-disciplinary multi-institute approach to translational cancer research: lessons learned from Pennsylvania Cancer Alliance Bioinformatics Consortium (PCABC).Cancer informatics · 2007Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAdvances in molecular biology and growing requirements from biomarker validation studies have generated a need for tissue banks to provide quality-controlled tissue samples with standardized clinical annotation. The NCI Cooperative Prostate Cancer Tissue Resource (CPCTR) is a distributed tissue bank that comprises four academic centers and provides thousands of clinically annotated prostate cancer specimens to researchers. Here we describe the CPCTR information management system architecture, common data element (CDE) development, query interfaces, data curation, and quality control.
methodsData managers review the medical records to collect and continuously update information for the 145 clinical, pathological and inventorial CDEs that the Resource maintains for each case. An Access-based data entry tool provides de-identification and a standard communication mechanism between each group and a central CPCTR database. Standardized automated quality control audits have been implemented. Centrally, an Oracle database has web interfaces allowing multiple user-types, including the general public, to mine de-identified information from all of the sites with three levels of specificity and granularity as well as to request tissues through a formal letter of intent.
resultsSince July 2003, CPCTR has offered over 6,000 cases (38,000 blocks) of highly characterized prostate cancer biospecimens, including several tissue microarrays (TMA). The Resource developed a website with interfaces for the general public as well as researchers and internal members. These user groups have utilized the web-tools for public query of summary data on the cases that were available, to prepare requests, and to receive tissues. As of December 2005, the Resource received over 130 tissue requests, of which 45 have been reviewed, approved and filled. Additionally, the Resource implemented the TMA Data Exchange Specification in its TMA program and created a computer program for calculating PSA recurrence.
conclusionBuilding a biorepository infrastructure that meets today's research needs involves time and input of many individuals from diverse disciplines. The CPCTR can provide large volumes of carefully annotated prostate tissue for research initiatives such as Specialized Programs of Research Excellence (SPOREs) and for biomarker validation studies and its experience can help development of collaborative, large scale, virtual tissue banks in other organ systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.