ReviewJournal of the Royal Society of Medicine2006
Research misconduct: the poisoning of the well.
Review in Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed.
- Research Misconduct in Academia: Examining the Views of Academics in a Public University in Ghana.Science and engineering ethics · 2026Article
- Article
- Gerontologists combating fraudulent research participants: recommendations from design to dissemination.The Gerontologist · 2025Article
- What Can We Learn from the Retraction of Medical Articles.Medical science educator · 2025Article
- Institutional capacity to prevent and manage research misconduct: perspectives from Kenyan research regulators.Research integrity and peer review · 2023Article
- Using the consolidated framework for implementation research to guide a pilot of implementing an institution level patient informed consent process for clinical research at an outpatient setting.Pilot and feasibility studies · 2023Article
- A cross-sectional examination of conflict-of-interest disclosures of physician-authors publishing in high-impact US medical journals.BMJ open · 2022Article
- Human research ethics committees members: ethical review personal perceptions.Monash bioethics review · 2021Review
- Article
- Institutional Conflicts of Interest in Academic Research.Science and engineering ethics · 2019Article
- On Some Possible Ramifications of the "Microplastics in Fish" Case.Science and engineering ethics · 2019Article
- Personality and fatal diseases: Revisiting a scientific scandal.Journal of health psychology · 2019Review
- Scientific Papers and Patents on Substances with Unproven Effects. Part 2.Recent patents on drug delivery & formulation · 2019Review
- The Possibility of Systematic Research Fraud Targeting Under-Studied Human Genes: Causes, Consequences, and Potential Solutions.Biomarker insights · 2019Review
- In Their Own Words: Research Misconduct from the Perspective of Researchers in Malaysian Universities.Science and engineering ethics · 2018Article
- Scientific Misconduct: A Global Concern.Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India · 2018Article
- Concern noted: A descriptive study of editorial expressions of concern in PubMed and PubMed Central.Research integrity and peer review · 2017Article
- Research misconduct and data fraud in clinical trials: prevalence and causal factors.International journal of clinical oncology · 2016Review
- A Proposed Strategy for Research Misconduct Policy: A Review on Misconduct Management in Health Research System.International journal of preventive medicine · 2016Article
- Scientific misconduct: a perspective from India.Medicine, health care, and philosophy · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.