Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16672387›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2006

Comparison of DNA fingerprinting methods for use in investigation of type E botulism outbreaks in the Canadian Arctic.

Daniel Leclair, Franco Pagotto, Jeffrey M Farber, Brigitte Cadieux, John W Austin

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Identification of a newFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Tracking sources of Clostridium botulinum type E contamination in seal meat.International journal of circumpolar health · 2017
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Daniel LeclairBureau of Microbial Hazards, Health Products and Food Branch, Food Directorate, Health Canada, Tunney's Pasture, PL 2204A2, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1A 0L2.
Franco Pagotto
Jeffrey M Farber
Brigitte Cadieux
John W Austin

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), randomly amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analysis, and automated ribotyping were compared for epidemiological typing of Clostridium botulinum type E using clinical and food isolates associated with four botulism outbreaks occurring in the Canadian Arctic. All type E strains previously untypeable by PFGE, even with the use of a formaldehyde fixation step, could be typed by the addition of 50 microM thiourea to the electrophoresis running buffer. Digestion with SmaI or XhoI followed by PFGE was used to link food and clinical isolates from four different type E botulism outbreaks and differentiate them from among 39 group II strains. Strain differentiation was unsuccessful with the automated ribotyping system, producing a single characteristic EcoRI fingerprint common to all group II strains. RAPD analysis of C. botulinum group II strains was not consistently reproducible with primer OPJ-6 or OPJ-13, apparently discriminating between epidemiologically related strains. A modified PFGE protocol was judged to be the most useful method for typing epidemiologically related C. botulinum type E strains, based on its ability to type all strains reproducibly and with an adequate level of discrimination.

Indexed as

Clostridium botulinum type EArctic RegionsBacterial Typing TechniquesBase SequenceBotulismCanadaDisease OutbreaksDNA, BacterialDNA FingerprintingElectrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-FieldEnvironmental MicrobiologyFood MicrobiologyHumansRandom Amplified Polymorphic DNA TechniqueReproducibility of ResultsRibotypingDNA, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID16672387
PMCPMC1479196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.