ArticleProtein science : a publication of the Protein Society2006
Contribution of the mu loop to the structure and function of rat glutathione transferase M1-1.
Article in Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Discovery and Characterization of Two Selective Inhibitors for a Mu-Class Glutathione S-Transferase of 25 kDa fromBiomolecules · 2024Article
- Molecular Cloning, Expression and Enzymatic Characterization of Tetrahymena thermophila Glutathione-S-Transferase Mu 34.The protein journal · 2024Article
- The diverse functions of Mu-class Glutathione S-transferase HrGSTm1 during the development of Hyalomma rufipes with a focus on the detoxification metabolism of cyhalothrin.Parasites & vectors · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The "mu loop," an 11-residue loop spanning amino acid residues 33-43, is a characteristic structural feature of the mu class of glutathione transferases. To assess the contribution of the mu loop to the structure and function of rat GST M1-1, amino acid residues 35-44 (35GDAPDYDRSQ44) were excised by deletion mutagenesis, resulting in the "Deletion Enzyme." Kinetic studies reveal that the Km values of the Deletion Enzyme are markedly increased compared with those of the wild-type enzyme: 32-fold for 1-chloro-2,4-dinitrobenzene, 99-fold for glutathione, and 880-fold for monobromobimane, while the Vmax value for each substrate is increased only modestly. Results from experiments probing the structure of the Deletion Enzyme, in comparison with that of the wild-type enzyme, suggest that the secondary and quaternary structures have not been appreciably perturbed. Thermostability studies indicate that the Deletion Enzyme is as stable as the wild-type enzyme at 4 degrees C and 10 degrees C, but it rapidly loses activity at 25 degrees C, unlike the wild-type enzyme. In the temperature range of 4 degrees C through 25 degrees C, the loss of activity of the Deletion Enzyme is not the result of a change in its structure, as determined by circular dichroism spectroscopy and sedimentation equilibrium centrifugation. Collectively, these results indicate that the mu loop is not essential for GST M1-1 to maintain its structure nor is it required for the enzyme to retain some catalytic activity. However, it is an important determinant of the enzyme's affinity for its substrates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.