Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16672066›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2006

SNP-SNP interactions in breast cancer susceptibility.

Venüs Ummiye Onay, Laurent Briollais, Julia A Knight, Ellen Shi, Yuanyuan Wang, Sean Wells, Hong Li, Isaac Rajendram, Irene L Andrulis, Hilmi Ozcelik

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers, 19 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed, 19 pooled it
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed, 19 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 178 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Disease markers · 2018
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Genetic association between cyclin D1 polymorphism and breast cancer susceptibility.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2014
    Pooled it
  10. XPD Asp312Asn and Lys751Gln polymorphisms and breast cancer susceptibility: a meta-analysis.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2014
    Pooled it
  11. The cyclin D1 (CCND1) G870A polymorphism and lung cancer susceptibility: a meta-analysis.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2013
    Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Pooled it
  16. Pooled it
  17. Pooled it
  18. Pooled it
  19. Pooled it
  20. Article

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Venüs Ummiye OnayFred A. Litwin Centre for Cancer Genetics, Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. onay@mshri.on.ca
Laurent Briollais
Julia A Knight
Ellen Shi
Yuanyuan Wang
Sean Wells
Hong Li
Isaac Rajendram
Irene L Andrulis
Hilmi Ozcelik
Mount Sinai Hospital · CAUniversity of Toronto · CACancer Care Ontario · CALunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute · CA

Funding

Targeted Prodrug Therapy of Liver CancersR01CA095003 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI KUO, MACUS T · 2002 to 2005
$1.1M
NCI NIH HHS CA-95-003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBreast cancer predisposition genes identified to date (e.g., BRCA1 and BRCA2) are responsible for less than 5% of all breast cancer cases. Many studies have shown that the cancer risks associated with individual commonly occurring single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are incremental. However, polygenic models suggest that multiple commonly occurring low to modestly penetrant SNPs of cancer related genes might have a greater effect on a disease when considered in combination.

methodsIn an attempt to identify the breast cancer risk conferred by SNP interactions, we have studied 19 SNPs from genes involved in major cancer related pathways. All SNPs were genotyped by TaqMan 5'nuclease assay. The association between the case-control status and each individual SNP, measured by the odds ratio and its corresponding 95% confidence interval, was estimated using unconditional logistic regression models. At the second stage, two-way interactions were investigated using multivariate logistic models. The robustness of the interactions, which were observed among SNPs with stronger functional evidence, was assessed using a bootstrap approach, and correction for multiple testing based on the false discovery rate (FDR) principle.

resultsNone of these SNPs contributed to breast cancer risk individually. However, we have demonstrated evidence for gene-gene (SNP-SNP) interaction among these SNPs, which were associated with increased breast cancer risk. Our study suggests cross talk between the SNPs of the DNA repair and immune system (XPD-[Lys751Gln] and IL10-[G(-1082)A]), cell cycle and estrogen metabolism (CCND1-[Pro241Pro] and COMT-[Met108/158Val]), cell cycle and DNA repair (BARD1-[Pro24Ser] and XPD-[Lys751Gln]), and within carcinogen metabolism (GSTP1-[Ile105Val] and COMT-[Met108/158Val]) pathways.

conclusionThe importance of these pathways and their communication in breast cancer predisposition has been emphasized previously, but their biological interactions through SNPs have not been described. The strategy used here has the potential to identify complex biological links among breast cancer genes and processes. This will provide novel biological information, which will ultimately improve breast cancer risk management.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBreast NeoplasmsBreast Neoplasms, MaleCase-Control StudiesFemaleGenes, DominantGenes, RecessiveGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenotypeHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedPolymorphism, Single NucleotideRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID16672066
PMCPMC1522021
OpenAlexW1490453899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.