Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16670962›Full record

ArticleJournal of occupational rehabilitation2006

Initial depression severity and the trajectory of recovery following cognitive-behavioral intervention for work disability.

Michael J L Sullivan, Heather Adams, Pascal Thibault, Marc Corbière, William D Stanish

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of occupational rehabilitation, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Mental health status of Ontario injured workers with permanent impairments.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2012
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Michael J L SullivanDepartment of Psychology, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Quebéc, Canada. michael.jl.sullivan@umontreal.ca
Heather Adams
Pascal Thibault
Marc Corbière
William D Stanish
Université de Montréal · CADalhousie University · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe present study examined the recovery trajectories of a group of mildly depressed and moderately-severely depressed injured workers enrolled in a 10-week community-based rehabilitation program.

methodsA sample of 168 individuals (75 women, 93 men) with a disabling musculoskeletal pain condition participated in the research. On the basis of BDI-II (1) scores at pre-treatment assessment, patients were classified as either mildly (BDI-II =9-16; N=68) or moderately-severely depressed (BDI-II >16; N: 100).

resultsBoth groups showed significant reductions in depression, but individuals in the (initially) moderately-severely depressed group were more likely to score in the depressed range of the BDI-II at post-treatment than individuals who were initially mildly depressed. For the mildly depressed group, early treatment reductions in pain catastrophizing, and perceived disability predicted improvement in depression scores. For the moderately-severely depressed group, none of the early treatment changes predicted improvement in depression; only late treatment reductions in pain catastrophizing and fear of movement/re-injury predicted improvement in depression. Chi-square analysis revealed that patients who were no longer depressed at post-treatment had the highest probability of returning to work (91%), followed by (post-treatment) mildly depressed patients (60%), and finally (post-treatment) moderately-severely depressed patients (26%), chi(2)=38.9, p < 0.001.

conclusionIn order to maximize return to work potential, the content, structure and duration of rehabilitation programs requires modification as a function of the injured workers level of the depression severity.

Indexed as

Cognitive Behavioral TherapyAdultDepressionDisability EvaluationEmploymentFearFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMusculoskeletal DiseasesOccupational DiseasesPainPain MeasurementSeverity of Illness IndexWorkers' Compensation

Identifiers

PMID16670962
OpenAlexW2047224066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.