Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16670851›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2006

Patient and caregiver time burden associated with anaemia treatment in different patient populations.

Arthur C Houts, Geoffrey A Loh, Barry V Fortner, Joel D Kallich

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Symptoms and treatment burden associated with cancer treatment: results from a cross-sectional national survey in the U.S.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2008
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Arthur C HoutsSupportive Oncology Services and Accelerated Community Oncology, Memphis, TN 38138, USA. ahouts@sosacorn.com
Geoffrey A Loh
Barry V Fortner
Joel D Kallich
Aging Community Coordinated Enterprises and Supportive Services (United States) · USAmgen (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

goalsCancer patients treated with chemotherapy often develop anaemia. This cross-sectional analysis examined the effect of anaemia treatment on patient and caregiver time and activities. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe analysis included 9,920 patients from 646 US outpatient oncology centres. Patients completed a survey that contained questions about travel time, total time for the visit and other impacts.

resultsThe mean time taken for a single clinic visit to receive anaemia treatment was 2.2 h. On average, patients receiving epoetin alfa required 17.6 h more than patients receiving darbepoetin alfa to complete a course of anaemia treatment. All patients in the study reported that they had to adjust at least one activity as a result of clinic visits. Older patients, women and patients from low-income areas were more likely to be accompanied during clinic visits.

conclusionsReducing the number of clinic visits needed for anaemia treatment by using darbepoetin alfa may benefit patients.

Indexed as

CaregiversAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnemiaCross-Sectional StudiesDarbepoetin alfaEmploymentEpoetin AlfaErythropoietinFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsDarbepoetin alfaEpoetin AlfaErythropoietinRecombinant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID16670851
OpenAlexW2153555594

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.