ReviewClinical rheumatology2007
Strategies for the prevention and control of osteoporosis in developing countries.
Review in Clinical rheumatology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- An audit of the fracture liaison service at Helen Joseph Tertiary Hospital, Johannesburg, South Africa.Archives of osteoporosis · 2026Article
- Knowledge and Awareness of Osteoporosis: A Survey of Physical Therapy Providers in Saudi Arabia.International journal of clinical practice · 2024Article
- Consensus statement: osteoporosis prevention and treatment in Latin America-current structure and future directions.Archives of osteoporosis · 2018Review
- Osteoporosis prevention and osteoporosis exercise in community-based public health programs.Osteoporosis and sarcopenia · 2017Review
- Fall-related injuries in a low-income setting: Results from a pilot injury surveillance system in Rawalpindi, Pakistan.Journal of epidemiology and global health · 2015Observational
- Fracture risk assessment in Latin America: is Frax an adaptable instrument for the region?Clinical rheumatology · 2010Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The frequency of osteoporosis and fragility fractures has been studied to a very limited extent in few developing countries. The aim of this paper is to review briefly the burden of osteoporosis and fragility fractures in these countries and to propose some strategies for the prevention and control of those conditions, considering barriers and facilitators for their implementation. The evolution of the demographic composition in most regions with developing countries shows a considerable increase in life expectancy and therefore, a significant growth in elderly population can be expected. Reports on the incidence of fragility fractures show figures in many of those countries that are comparable to those found in developed nations. Health resources (for acute treatment of fractures, their rehabilitation and chronic management, for diagnostic centers and drug therapy for osteoporosis) are limited in most of those regions and are allocated to other health priorities. Internationally accepted guidelines can be adapted to the realities of developing nations and may be promoted by organizations of health professionals and patients, but require endorsement and support by health authorities. The steps should include: (a) campaigns to increase awareness, both among the population at risk and relevant health workers; (b) the promotion of a preventive lifestyle in the general population; (c) the development of national or regional, evidence-based guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis; (d) development and implementation of guidelines for the treatment of fragility fractures, their rehabilitation and prevention of falls; (e) collection of economic data on fractures and osteoporosis; and (f) development of country-specific fracture databases. These steps may help in reducing the increasing burden of osteoporotic fractures. Their implementation will require solid scientific basis and commitment from policy makers, health professionals, patient organizations, and ultimately the general population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.